Comments Thread For: Hearn: Joshua Needed Wilder to Sign to Get Exemption From WBA

[Throwingbombs]

Ooooooooh Deontay Deontay where's your pen! Where's your pen! Where's your pen! Lalalala

[Shadoww702]

another hypocrite.

“AJ should have signed! Screw the details!”

“No way should Wilder sign without all the details!”

Hmmm.....

What details? AJ said pay me $50,000,000 and Ill fight Wilder. Why not hold someone accountable for what they say? Why did he lie then?

[EnglishOxide]

hearn already emailed finkel earlier in the week saying the date for the fight would be april and theyre fighting povetkin next no matter what.

hearn never wanted wilder to be next.

But if you're saying they have a couple of weeks before WBA call purse bids then it doesn't matter right? Finkel can send the contract as he was going to do and then tell the world AJ can sign it and get it on next.

Maybe he should do that. What does he have to lose? From what we know the Povetkin contract has not been signed yet.

Let's see. Because they've given up on the fight awfully quick if you are stating it can still be done with the WBA's blessing.

Or is it just Eddie Hearns fault again? Turn the tables and tell him the contract is signed on their end and it's not too late. Let's just see if Finkel does that.

[Jimmy gold]

Either wilder is mentally champion country boy or plain scared of AJ or both buuuummmm squuuuuaaaad

[LetOutTheCage]

another hypocrite.

“AJ should have signed! Screw the details!”

“No way should Wilder sign without all the details!”

Hmmm.....

That's hypocrisy for you, some of these fanatics wont ever see anything wrong with the fighter they support.

[N/A]

But if you're saying they have a couple of weeks before WBA call purse bids then it doesn't matter right? Finkel can send the contract as he was going to do and then tell the world AJ can sign it and get it on next.

The problem is that Hearn has already told Finkel the Povetkin fight is definitely next no matter what Finkel does.

And Hearn still hasn't sent a contract stipulating the fight would be next, so Wilder would still be technically signing a contract that would allow Hearn to bind him to an April 2019 fight.

[EnglishOxide]

And Hearn still hasn't sent a contract stipulating the fight would be next, so Wilder would still be technically signing a contract that would allow Hearn to bind him to an April 2019 fight.

Just clarify something for me please.

Finkel insinuates, without actually saying he's sending a signed contract back with comments on Friday and the fight is done.

You say that Hearn needs to send a revised contract. Which is it?

[N/A]

Just clarify something for me please.

Finkel insinuates, without actually saying he's sending a signed contract back with comments on Friday and the fight is done.

You say that Hearn needs to send a revised contract. Which is it?

Finkel was going to send back a signed contract with the date given to him by Hearn inserted into the contract.

The problem is that Hearn ended up telling him to insert April 2019 and at that point, Wilder was no longer willing to sign.

[EnglishOxide]

Finkel was going to send back a signed contract with the date given to him by Hearn inserted into the contract.

So there's nothing to stop him still doing that is there? Wilder can still sign.

He has nothing to lose. It don't matter if Eddie says it's April. If it takes a week to sign the Povetkin fight then the contract could be sitting in Hearns desk ready to be signed and then Hearn can apply for an exception.

[N/A]

So there's nothing to stop him still doing that is there? Wilder can still sign.

So you want Wilder to sign a contract sent by Hearn, with a random date inserted that Hearn didn't approve. Even though Hearn already said Povetkin is definitely next and AJ won't fight Wilder until April?

What exactly would this accomplish other than making Wilder look like a giant idiot? Hearn already said he doesn't want the fight next. It's over. Move on. Maybe they can circle back after their interim fights and try to negotiate again.