He's probably the best boxer in the world right now, how is that a hype job?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Are you ready to call Loma a HYPE JOB if...........
Collapse
-
Originally posted by uppercut510 View Postyou do realize what site you are posting on right?
I try to skip most of the it though.
Comment
-
-
Because Linares is just an average fighter right? I really dont understand this concept of losing to another very good fighter = hypejob.
Comment
-
Originally posted by b00g13man View PostIf one of the best p4p fighters in the world can't beat Linares, then what does that say about him?
that linares is a solid fighter when you can't cut him, rough him up, or hurt him. styles make fights. lomachenko also started at 125 lbs, if you recall, as a grown man. he's very small.
so it says styles make fights, that he's small, and that linares has very good boxing skills if you're unable to knock off the polish.
answer the question, and i'll add a new one:
is lomachenko a p4p ranked fighter or not? [and name 10 better fighters if he is not! ]
and does a loss take away your wins?
linares is literally the lineal champion a weight class up. when lomachenko beats him you'll just say "fight crawford doe."Last edited by New England; 05-11-2018, 06:35 AM.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Boksfan View PostHe's probably the best boxer in the world right now, how is that a hype job?
they don't understand that becasue they don't understand boxing. even if you think crawford is better there is no reasonable ranking for lomachenko other than 1 or 2. these guys are complete idiots. i mean completeyl unable to function cognitively. they probably needed special attention in school just to learn to tie shoes.
Comment
-
Originally posted by New England View Postthey don't understand that becasue they don't understand boxing. even if you think crawford is better there is no reasonable ranking for lomachenko other than 1 or 2. these guys are complete idiots. i mean completeyl unable to function cognitively. they probably needed special attention in school just to learn to tie shoes.
While that is childish and petty, I see no reason that guys like you that claim to be neutral and objective are denouncing it now when you didn't denounce it then. Much like my answer to the question you posed to me about being on the OJ jury, you should be able to see how that makes posters like you come off, even though you are really not like that.
I'm sure you will not agree with my points as we have discussed this before.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ric-O Suave View PostSTFU Stumpy.....YDKSAB............
JK I Love you...............
stumpy lol. i've seen your pictures, you literally have cellulite on your arms. your f#cking arms
you get exposed for making a thread about lomachenko being a hype job, [literally the dumbest kind of rhetoric you hear from people who genuinely know nothing aoout boxing and are a waste of time on here,] and you are reduced to attacking me personally.
you're a vapid mouth breather who knows nothing about a sport in spite of taking the time to make an account and several thousand posts. that is what it is. you've got to be rock ****** to stick around for this long and think you need to make a thread about whether or not the best boxer on the planet is a f#cking hype job.
is vasyl lomachenko a hype job if he loses to the lineal 135 lb champion of the world?
i'm sorry, maybe you have some kind of handicap and i shoudln't be making fun of you like this. there really isn't a ton else to explain it. you have to f#cking ask if the planet's best boxer is a hype job? the guy with the bst amateur boxing record ever? 350 fights and who avenged his only loss? as a f3cking amateur? two gold medals?
is this guy is a hype job guys?!?!?! i'm really f#cking stuypid, and ineed people to tell me what to think. bahhh. short arms doe
Comment
-
Comment