Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Loma is a p4p champ and #Biased/#NewMedia doesn't like it

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
    #1

    Loma is a p4p champ and #Biased/#NewMedia doesn't like it

    We all have seen the videos come by now... Lomachenko detractors bashing every win he's got and making one excuse after the other excuse...

    Fact is Lomachenko is the only one who beat a fellow p4p fighter and dominated him and made him quit... with skill, not size.

    I thought it was a 50/50 fight and Most of the #NewMedia said Rigo would destroy Loma and he would NEVER quit, and look what happened once again..

    Got ridiculous comments like 'yeah well if Lomachenko is so great why wont he go and fight Crawford at 147'. These guys are so desperate to see Loma lose again they want him to go up to fight a dude who is 20lbs bigger than him c'mon now lmao

    You guys of the #Newmedia cant take your L's like a man... just as bad as all the Wardhaters and Kov Fanboys you called out, and probably even worse sore losers.

    Am i the only one who thinks they just hate to see a european fighter at the top of the sport with great boxing skills?

    No one is #1 p4p undisputed rn but Loma, Crawford, GGG and Canelo all can make claim to p4p, its between them at this moment.

    The big youtubers are spreading lies and it's hurting boxing... it has become one big racial war, full off people who make it their own personal race war. Outright Disgusting.

    Let's start with the excuse that Rigo was too small and inactive... these same people will claim Gamboa as a great win for Crawford (who is probably their #1 p4p), but yet he came up in weight too and was more beaten on size as he was stopped after being knocked down a few times... while Loma made rigo quit with embarassing him with his speed and skill.

    Secondly "ohh yeah Walters was way too inactive, had a long lay off"
    Another ridiculous excuse... Walters had a similar and even slightly longer lay off before and Ko'd the dude he was fighting. He had long lay offs regularly. And people also must tend to forget thst gamboa (Great win for terence) came off an even longer lay off than Walters... yet that isnt mentioned? A bit weird isnt it ?

    Then Lastly Gary Russel was too green ? Hmmm...okay yet i've heard these same people calling Barrera a great win for Ward when Barrera hadnt faced anyone yet and became notable later. Russel became WBC Featherweight champion after the Loma loss and is one of the best in the division rn. So how was he too green but Barrera wasn't ?

    All of it is hypocritical... both Lomachenko and Crawford are great fighters and belong at the top of the p4p list. The same Excuses are made by both sides.. and it's getting ridiculous. Just give both boxers their due props.

    Okay rant over.
    #2
    I think there's just a general insecurity from certain folks that a guy from Eastern Europe is doing so well and has such a style. It's funny the people who were most certain of Russell, Walters and Rigo wins are the one's ****ting on those wins the hardest. I don't understand that. He won a combined 24/25 rounds and didn't get touched and forced two to quit so how can they not even give a tiny bit of credit? Instead they immediately move onto the next guy who Loma is "ducking" and will get "destroyed by". It's beyond tedious now and there's clearly an agenda behind it.

    The point you bring up about the layoff is interesting because a lot of the folks that hate Loma now have Crawford #1 and they are the one's that bash the Walters win (despite picking him) because of an 11 month layoff yet Gamboa was off 12 months and Postol was out 10 so wheres the fairness in that? The size difference between Crawford-Gamboa was bigger than that of Loma-Rigo (and they still picked Rigo).

    Comment

      #3
      Though I have him at #1, he just beat a tiny guy that came up 2 divisions. I can see why some are hesitant. There's legit arguments for GG and Crawford. Personally, I see Loma as #1.

      Your thread might be more compelling if you weren't the troll that just accused Mikey Garcia of going to 140 to avoid Loma. Seriously ******.

      Comment

        #4
        you have loma fans themselves making threads about how he can beat 147lbers and then other loma fans agreeing with the thread

        now you wanna act like its ward lovers and anti EE guys acting like he has to do it to prove something?

        Comment

          #5
          Lomachenko was a big favourite over Rigo. Why are people acting like he wasn't expected to win?

          Comment

            #6
            Originally posted by Redd Foxx View Post
            Though I have him at #1, he just beat a tiny guy that came up 2 divisions. I can see why some are hesitant. There's legit arguments for GG and Crawford. Personally, I see Loma as #1.

            Your thread might be more compelling if you weren't the troll that just accused Mikey Garcia of going to 140 to avoid Loma. Seriously ******.


            Same thoughts here mayne. P4P #1 in my personal opinion but if you get bothered that people bring up the fact that Loma was a >=4/1 favorite and Rigo was 37 & much smaller to defend their choice of another guy as #1... then you don't have very tough skin.
            Last edited by BrometheusBob.; 12-14-2017, 03:16 PM.

            Comment

              #7
              Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
              Lomachenko was a big favourite over Rigo. Why are people acting like he wasn't expected to win?
              It was obvious who would win especially with the odds coming out, but that still made a certain group pick Rigo because of skin color. After all those videos of "breakdowns" by them and acting like they know about boxing its nothing but excuses. If you knew he was old and small going and still picked him you have no excuses.

              Comment

                #8
                Originally posted by RetroSpeed05 View Post
                It was obvious who would win especially with the odds coming out, but that still made a certain group pick Rigo because of skin color. After all those videos of "breakdowns" by them and acting like they know about boxing its nothing but excuses. If you knew his was old and small going and still picked him you have no excuses.
                Really? That's all you have. Fans of any sport support and predict victories even when they know they will likely lose.

                Loma was a big favourite fighting a guy 2 divisions smaller. He admitted himself that was a factor. Common sense he won't get as much credit as he would have fighting a P4P fighter his own size. Nothing to do with race you faggots.

                Comment

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Robbie Barrett View Post
                  Lomachenko was a big favourite over Rigo. Why are people acting like he wasn't expected to win?
                  Flomas. Flomaschenko #Flømøs rebirth

                  Comment

                    #10
                    Pound for Pound rankings aren't real. Even world title aren't real much of the time. Boxing rankings are opinion based but Lomachenko is clearly one of the best in the world and has a chance to even a spectacular career. Who cares what the order p4p order is, but Loma better be on it.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X
                    TOP