Comments Thread For: Kell Brook Still Mulling 'Weight' Decision, Will Return in 2018

[j.razor]

Brook vs khan then BOTH of them retire!
Its' OVER! 154 would kill brook cuz I'm sure he not messing with Jermell....Lions Only!

[AdonisCreed]

GGG ruined him.

He never should had taken that fight his management set him up for failure. It ain't enough money in the world that's worth having fractured facial bones smh

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

Didn't say they didn't have an effect, but if you seriously think that was a 100% Brook in there then you're an idiot and know nothing about boxing or training.

Brook was a drained fighter in there, accept that. He said before the GGG fight he was fighting at 60% at 147, and then suddenly he goes up to MW, loses, goes back to 147 looing drained as **** and he was 100% and it was ALL Spence that beat him. Brook should have never taken the fight, you can't beat guys like Spence in your 30's after going up to MW and draining yourself. Never been done and never will.

Spence beat the **** out of him. And they're the same size if anything Spence is the bigger man, he was obviously drained at 147 well. Typical matchroom BS excuses.

[Bronx2245]

ThAboxing voice did a interview with Hearn yesterday and he said they were offered the Cotto fight but Kell would only have had 8 weeks to train and he has a lot of weight to lose and he's coming off 2 loses, so they want to put him in with a soft touch first

If he can't make 154 in 8 weeks, then I don't see why he's even thinking about 147!

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

He never should had taken that fight his management set him up for failure. It ain't enough money in the world that's worth having fractured facial bones smh

Completely Agree!! Hearns greed and ego have ruined this guys career he had no business being fed to GGG.

[Sir_Didymus]

I remember when his fans claimed he's the best welterweight in the world when he's faced nobody of note at welterweight other than a lifetime of super bums and winning a close decision against a wind-milling midget who chased a rematch. Yet mysteriously is removed from the IBF completely.

I remember when his fans said he did well against GGG when he had his orbital smashed to bits and his hands were completely down by his sides and a brutal knockout was coming before a towel got thrown in. They called it a "freak injury" LMFAO!!

I remember how they took that as a moral victory into the "Jeff Lacey" fight. I remember how he said he'll never show his face around his hometown of Sheffield if he lost to "Jeff Lacey".

I remember how he went down on one knee to QUIT like a ***** after having his other orbital smashed by "Jeff Lacey".

I remember how his fans booed him out of the stadium. I remember how his fans afterwards called it a "freak injury"...again.

I remember how they made excuses for his weight and still are even though he himself along with his trainer and promoter said he made weight perfectly before and after the fight.

Eye Remember. Do you?

[Vinnykin]

Spence beat the **** out of him. And they're the same size if anything Spence is the bigger man, he was obviously drained at 147 well. Typical matchroom BS excuses.

Sure they are. Look at videos of Spence then look at Brook within the last 2 weeks, you can find footage of him training with BJS on twitter, the guy is WAY bigger than Spence! not to mention Brook is in his 30's, which any one with a brain knows cutting weight at that age is worse. Brook at Spence's age would have done it no problem, Brook at 31 and after fighting at MW and not fighting at 147 for 14 months makes it ENTIRELY different! surely you can admit that?

How can any one that knows boxing think this was a good decision by Brook to fight a young lion like Spence after fighting at MW and not being at 147 for 14 months? seriously?

[RJJ-94-02=GOAT]

Sure they are. Look at videos of Spence then look at Brook within the last 2 weeks, you can find footage of him training with BJS on twitter, the guy is WAY bigger than Spence! not to mention Brook is in his 30's, which any one with a brain knows cutting weight at that age is worse. Brook at Spence's age would have done it no problem, Brook at 31 and after fighting at MW and not fighting at 147 for 14 months makes it ENTIRELY different! surely you can admit that?

How can any one that knows boxing think this was a good decision by Brook to fight a young lion like Spence after fighting at MW and not being at 147 for 14 months? seriously?

It clearly wasn't a wise decision but all fight week Brook, Hearn, Nelson and all the rest of the Matchroom weirdos were telling us how Brook had, had a great camp and made the weight safely and would be a too strong at 147. Then he gets his ass beat, he quits like a b*tch and then all we hear is a load of BS EXCUSES!! The moment Brook fought somebody his own size at 147 he got found out and quit. And that's the truth of the matter

[koolkc107]

Didn't say they didn't have an effect, but if you seriously think that was a 100% Brook in there then you're an idiot and know nothing about boxing or training.

Brook was a drained fighter in there, accept that. He said before the GGG fight he was fighting at 60% at 147, and then suddenly he goes up to MW, loses, goes back to 147 looing drained as **** and he was 100% and it was ALL Spence that beat him. Brook should have never taken the fight, you can't beat guys like Spence in your 30's after going up to MW and draining yourself. Never been done and never will.

You know why this is hilarious, don't you?

Spence is as big or bigger than Brook.

If Kell was drained why wasn't Errol?





Before the fight, Brook said this camp wasn't any different than any others, that making 147 has always been a thing as he is a big welter.

He wasn't drained. It was the body shots.

[Vinnykin]

You know why this is hilarious, don't you?

Spence is as big or bigger than Brook.

If Kell was drained why wasn't Errol?





Before the fight, Brook said this camp wasn't any different than any others, that making 147 has always been a thing as he is a big welter.

He wasn't drained. It was the body shots.

He's also younger and didn't yo-yo in weight. Why is this hard to understand?

I also don't care what Brook said after his 6 month camp required to get down to 147, I care more for what he said pre-GGG, that he was operating at 60% BEFORE the yo-yo and not fighting at 147 for 14 months.

You can't seriously argue why a prime guy who has never yo-yo'd makes weight better than a guy who went up and was struggling pre-GGG to get down.