Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SHOCKING!!! The punches Compubox counted for Golovkin. GIFS

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    Originally posted by stealthradon View Post
    I know right?
    They even counted

    as a hit.
    Your third image is a lie by omission. Why do you need to lie? There was always a delay on compubox scoring, and they clearly counted one of these, not even seconds before your gif.
    Ts exposed as a liar is nothing new.

    It's like this,
    -first gif, jab lands
    -second gif, really close, if something landed it's the right hand and it skimmed off canelo because it looks like it exploded off his gloves
    -third gif is a lie, as exposed
    -fourth gif golovkin throws a right uppercut, and a left (arm punch) uppercut, and lands two jabs at the end. He lands "atleast" two punches.

    The only gif here that is in question is the second, and I can't blame anyone for thinking that right hand landed, because it could have, but definitely taken mostly on the gloves.

    I've yet to see as bad a count as when Mayweather got one from a wide miss.

    Comment


      #42
      LOL at that 181-82 bs video by the producer of "Canelo's Dumbest Moments" that people are still pushing.

      And sure OP you can look at clips & see failures in compubox. EVEN COMPUBOX says they aren't 100% right. I don't know why people jack off to these numbers not being 100% correct like they do.

      Personally I'd like to see Compubox do a companion count AFTER the fight taking their sweet ass time on slomo or frame by frame & get "the real numbers" to compare with their "in the moment numbers" so there could be some honest & legit 100% or at least closer to 100% numbers cuz even on tape it might not be 100% conclusive to see if a punch landed from the available angles.

      But mainly I think that'd shut the f#ck up of these dummies who keep acting like Compubox is some biblical sh^t or these other dummies who act like it doesn't mean anything. As usual a lot of boxing fans gotta believe one extreme or the other it seems lol, when the truth as virtually always lives in the middle.

      Comment


        #43
        In the second GIF Canelo landed 2 punches at the end and the counter doesn't move. Lol

        Comment


          #44
          Originally posted by Eff Pandas View Post
          LOL at that 181-82 bs video by the producer of "Canelo's Dumbest Moments" that people are still pushing.

          And sure OP you can look at clips & see failures in compubox. EVEN COMPUBOX says they aren't 100% right. I don't know why people jack off to these numbers not being 100% correct like they do.

          Personally I'd like to see Compubox do a companion count AFTER the fight taking their sweet ass time on slomo or frame by frame & get "the real numbers" to compare with their "in the moment numbers" so there could be some honest & legit 100% or at least closer to 100% numbers cuz even on tape it might not be 100% conclusive to see if a punch landed from the available angles.

          But mainly I think that'd shut the f#ck up of these dummies who keep acting like Compubox is some biblical sh^t or these other dummies who act like it doesn't mean anything. As usual a lot of boxing fans gotta believe one extreme or the other it seems lol, when the truth as virtually always lives in the middle.
          Even if Compubox is 100% accurate with their tally it could still be very misleading.

          For example, grazing shots or open glove shots is not the same as clean, closed glove hits. So if somebody is flickering the jab and not punching through the target, is that the same as a flush jab rocking your head back?

          Also, one fighter could land the majority of his punches in a few rounds and have an overall higher number of punches landed through the fight, however, boxing matches are judges on a round by round basis. So again compubox stats could be very, very misleading. If this was the amateurs system from back in the day where it was a point-scoring system the overall number of punches in a fight could make sense but even in the amateur 3 out of 5 judges had to click a button within a second in order for that punch to be turned into a point. In Compubox, we rely on one person's vision and many times they get it wrong as it is pointed out in this thread.

          Comment


            #45
            It's been 4 days since the fight y'all still coming up with excuses on why Canelo got a gift.

            Give it up already.

            Comment


              #46
              Originally posted by pesticid View Post
              Even if Compubox is 100% accurate with their tally it could still be very misleading.

              For example, grazing shots or open glove shots is not the same as clean, closed glove hits. So if somebody is flickering the jab and not punching through the target, is that the same as a flush jab rocking your head back?
              Idk what could be misleading about facts if Compubox did produce a 100% or as close as one can reasonably expect 100% version of punch stat numbers a week or so later. Its just numbers of what happened.

              When you start going from there saying this means that or this doesn't mean that thats when you get in trouble with facts. Canelo threw x punches. Canelo got hit with x punches. Those would be facts like how much money you make each year or what grade your kid got on her history test. What you take away from Canelo throwing x punches & getting hit with x punches, your yearly income or your kids history grade would be a more subjective thing & debatable based on what you or I or anyone else would take away from those facts. Thats how facts work everywhere any damn way.

              This isn't as complicated as some of you make it out to be. If grazed punches count or don't count you put that in the disclaimer at the bottom of the facts as counted. Hell you can count the grazed punches separately if you want. There are multiple ways to go about this if Compubox took the time to double down & prove or disprove how accurate their punch stat numbers are.

              And I believe a +/- top ten list created from those more accurate after the fight numbers would be a more powerful & meaningful P4P-like ranking then the current sci-fi fantasy bs P4P list.

              Comment


                #47
                LOL, Barrett doing the same thing he criticizes Spoon for. Karma, b!tch.
                Last edited by ironmt; 09-20-2017, 10:13 AM.

                Comment


                  #48
                  I felt like I was watching a totally different fight than compubox. Saw Golovkin missing punches all night. Mostly landed non-hurting jabs. Canelo strafed him with power shots at will when he wasn't resting on the ropes.

                  Comment


                    #49
                    Originally posted by SilverMiles View Post
                    It's been 4 days since the fight y'all still coming up with excuses on why Canelo got a gift.

                    Give it up already.
                    You sound insecure about ggg failing miserably on the big stage. What round did you predict Canelo getting knocked out?

                    Comment


                      #50
                      Thank goodness for slow motion. My eyes never see all the right connections and misses in real time. I could never hate on this. So dope to see these clips then rewatching again in full.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP