Comments Thread For: Ward To Kovalev: You Can Lie To The Public - You Can't Lie To Me!

[therealpugilist]

You make these bizarre claims with zero evidence.

there is evidence everywhere...you wont look nor care too, and common sense.....do your own homework

[Hype job]

but how did this thread turned about that?

Can't even remember, I think pugilist made a dig at whitey (like he always does) and I mentioned kangz, and travestyny started wildin out telling me his ancestors wuz pharaohs and sheit.

[Hype job]

there is evidence everywhere...you wont look nor care too, and common sense.....do your own homework

You're making the claim, the onus is on you to prove it.

[Cheek busting]

news flash..africa is a continent....the largest inhabited one of earth

it is scientifically proven that people descended from africans have the most diverse DNA on the planet.....Our women have the capabilities of giving off every human trait or phenotype

Africa has thousands of ethnic groups and languages with their own distinctive traits

skin color is one of the traits that mean the least....sadly europeans dont even understand this simple truth today

I have aunts and uncles with the same parents that NONE are the same skin HUe...also none of siblings nor i, my son or their children do either


you're a lost soul.....reading is fundamental...comprehension is vital



you need a real history crash course

Africa is a social construct - it's a land mass that was given its name.

That doesn't mean African = Kangz.

You admit that it is extremely genetically diverse.

I'll give you the OOA theory eveb though it's far from proven.

Still, the split between West Africans and North eastern "black" Africans such as the Nubian occurred tens of thousands of years ago. They look nothing like West Africans.

That's like the difference between white Europeans and Arabic, Semitic peoples. We're both Caucasian, but also vastly different as well.

The blacks who descended from West African ****** are NOT the same as Nubians.

Anyway, the Nubians wasn't the original KANGZ! They were ****** and conquered people to Egyptians, who went great lengths to depict themselves as different from them! This is NOT something to be proud of!

Yeah there was some Nubian Kangz for a few hundred years but they weren't the founding stock of Egypt.

In conclusion, doe, you are neither a KANG(Egyptian) nor a slave of the KANGZ(nubian).

[therealpugilist]

You make these bizarre claims with zero evidence.

there is evidence everywhere...you wont look nor care too, and common sense.....do your own homework

only 5% of the africans transported from africa came to mainland united states and also there were more ******(africans and indigenous americans) traded along the east coast and carribbean, brazil than coming across treacherous atlantic waters.....many of those enslaved were indigenous people....common sense...whats cheaper...going back and forth across a dangerous ocean which a round trip would take 3-5 months, or settling in america and moving and trading people in the same hemisphere?

you believe in fairy tails bro...bwahhaahhaahhaa

you are ******ed bro

[Cheek busting]

Whitey trying to erase our history of being kangz!!! Napoleon had the wide nostrils of the Sphinx blown off with cannon fire in a rage after realizing he wasn't a kang and da blacks wuz Kangz. This is 100% true

[Hype job]

there is evidence everywhere...you wont look nor care too, and common sense.....do your own homework

only 5% of the africans transported from africa came to mainland united states and also there were more ******(africans and indigenous americans) traded along the east coast and carribbean, brazil than coming across treacherous atlantic waters.....many of those enslaved were indigenous people....common sense...whats cheaper...going back and forth across a dangerous ocean which a round trip would take 3-5 months, or settling in america and moving and trading people in the same hemisphere?

you believe in fairy tails bro...bwahhaahhaahhaa

you are ******ed bro

So you have no proof of Africans circumnavigating the globe before whitey then.

[Cheek busting]

there is evidence everywhere...you wont look nor care too, and common sense.....do your own homework

only 5% of the africans transported from africa came to mainland united states and also there were more ******(africans and indigenous americans) traded along the east coast and carribbean, brazil than coming across treacherous atlantic waters.....many of those enslaved were indigenous people....common sense...whats cheaper...going back and forth across a dangerous ocean which a round trip would take 3-5 months, or settling in america and moving and trading people in the same hemisphere?

you believe in fairy tails bro...bwahhaahhaahhaa

you are ******ed bro

This isn't true, at least in North America.

It was known that enslaved indigenous Americans made terrible ****** because they would commit suicide, constantly try to escape, and some simply refused to do work and would not eat..

I'm sure there was some native ****** or indentured servants like there were some Irish, but native ****** didn't even come close to the African ****** in North America

[Hype job]

Africa is a social construct - it's a land mass that was given its name.

That doesn't mean African = Kangz.

You admit that it is extremely genetically diverse.

I'll give you the OOA theory eveb though it's far from proven.

Still, the split between West Africans and North eastern "black" Africans such as the Nubian occurred tens of thousands of years ago. They look nothing like West Africans.

That's like the difference between white Europeans and Arabic, Semitic peoples. We're both Caucasian, but also vastly different as well.

The blacks who descended from West African ****** are NOT the same as Nubians.

Anyway, the Nubians wasn't the original KANGZ! They were ****** and conquered people to Egyptians, who went great lengths to depict themselves as different from them! This is NOT something to be proud of!

Yeah there was some Nubian Kangz for a few hundred years but they weren't the founding stock of Egypt.

In conclusion, doe, you are neither a KANG(Egyptian) nor a slave of the KANGZ(nubian).

It's hilarious how they believe in this shyt, they truly think they were kangz and queenz and civilised the white devil who didn't know how to wash his ass. It's a hilarious self esteem boosting movement.

[Cheek busting]

It's hilarious how they believe in this shyt, they truly think they were kangz and queenz and civilised the white devil who didn't know how to wash his ass. It's a hilarious self esteem boosting movement.

Hahaha yes, and it doesn't stop at ancient Egypt. They also believe the Arabic Moors who managed to conquer parts of southern Europe before being owned by Charles Martel were blacks. There would have been some blacks among the Moors, probably even a few higher ranking officers, but the overwhelming majority were Semitic peoples.


Then they go on to say the founders of ancient Greece and Rome were kangz... and it doesn't even stop There! Supposedly king Henry was a kang (forgot which one), and all the indigenous people of Japan, China, Aztecs, Incas, etc were all KANGZ...

Beethoven was a kang... Shakespeare was a Kang (or the other theory is IF he was a white devil, that all his brilliant writings were ghost-written by a brilliant black woman hahah). So pick your poison whitey - your most accomplished writer was either a kang or the real genius behind his devil face was a QUEEN!!!


300 years from now Eminem will be a kang and Neil Armstrong a kang as well