The chance to beat the MW superstar has no value to these clowns. They always have to act like they're giving you favors. Look at how he talks, "my time is valuable, you need me, I'm VIP..." He mentions nothing about the opportunity to beat the guy on top, thus everything else is supposed to be secondary.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Eubank Jr. Eyes Golovkin - Claims Hearn Gave Away Fight To Brook
Collapse
-
Originally posted by aboutfkntime View PostTeam Golovkin are full-of-shht, and so is Hearn.....
..... but, Hearn was not representing the A-side, and he gave Team Eubank a (probably reasonable) ultimatum.....
..... the reason why I say " probably reasonable " is because they had been negotiating for quite some time, the date was approaching fast, and because Team Eubank did not deny the facts when it was publicly announced that Brook accepted the EXACT SAME DEAL that they were offered
I think it is fair to say that Eubank dropped the ball.....
Just as it is fair to say that Golovkin dropped the ball when it came to requesting Degale instead of the welterweight Kell Brook.
they could have done better, the date is no excuse..... they could have found a better opponent/date, like they just finished doing when the initial Jacobs negotiation first broke down
you find the best opponent, then you find the best date..... NOT the other way around..... unless you are cherry-picking to rack up easy paydays
Eubank needs to learn from this, like Red Foxx said.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Tomjas View PostDeGale was never offered and his relationship with Hearn is toxic anyway which is why he fights in the US under Haymon's banner
Comment
-
These morons thought Golovkin had no other options and they could get an absurd deal out of it. It backfired on them. It is 100% completely their fault the Golovkin fight didn't happen.
**** Eubank, all he does is talk and then never back it up. He acts like he's somebody and should get star treatment.
Comment
-
Originally posted by rogdogx View PostWhen the fight presented itself to Eubank, he lost his courage. Luckily fighters like Kell Brook and Danny Jacobs had the courage to accept the challenge. Eubank had his shot, he chickened out.
Boxers are rarely afraid, they rarely swerve fights or challenges. Real talk. Of course it happens, but it's rare. Especially when there are millions on the table, personal pride at stake.
Did this fight not happen because, pure and simple, Eubank b1tched out? It's a very simplistic view to take. I don't think that's the root cause.
In your world, Eubank-GGG didn't happen because Eubank got scared. Very simple and easy. Brook-GGG happened because 'Brook had the courage to accept the challenge.' So there are no shades of grey, there is no nuance. It's an anti-intellectual viewpoint and its frankly abhorrent. Open your eyes.
There is such a thing as negotiations. Boxing is a business, it's about maximising every payday and getting the maximum mileage out of a career.
My view is that Team Eubank weren't happy with the deal offered by Hearn; they felt they could get a better deal and they had a staring contest with Eddie and he called their bluff. The fact that even HEARN, who was in the centre of the negotiations, doesn't claim Eubank bottled it tells you all you need to know.
You remind me of Dan Rafael – you're clearly incapable of lateral thinking or deep analysis. Like a child, you jump to the first conclusion that makes the most sense to you and you repeat the party line insistently, because you can't comprehend another scenario. Typical keyboard warrior.
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by Kilrain View PostFans like you are amusing because everything is black and white in your world. No shades of grey, everything is clear cut. What planet do you live on? Life is not as simple as that. If a fight doesn't happen, it doesn't necessarily mean one man is scared to death. There are gradations, there are different perspectives, there are boxes to tick.
Boxers are rarely afraid, they rarely swerve fights or challenges. Real talk. Of course it happens, but it's rare. Especially when there are millions on the table, personal pride at stake.
Did this fight not happen because, pure and simple, Eubank b1tched out? It's a very simplistic view to take. I don't think that's the root cause.
In your world, Eubank-GGG didn't happen because Eubank got scared. Very simple and easy. Brook-GGG happened because 'Brook had the courage to accept the challenge.' So there are no shades of grey, there is no nuance. It's an anti-intellectual viewpoint and its frankly abhorrent. Open your eyes.
There is such a thing as negotiations. Boxing is a business, it's about maximising every payday and getting the maximum mileage out of a career.
My view is that Team Eubank weren't happy with the deal offered by Hearn; they felt they could get a better deal and they had a staring contest with Eddie and he called their bluff. The fact that even HEARN, who was in the centre of the negotiations, doesn't claim Eubank bottled it tells you all you need to know.
You remind me of Dan Rafael – you're clearly incapable of lateral thinking or deep analysis. Like a child, you jump to the first conclusion that makes the most sense to you and you repeat the party line insistently, because you can't comprehend another scenario. Typical keyboard warrior.Last edited by rogdogx; 12-24-2016, 10:17 PM.
Comment
Comment