Originally posted by My Low Place
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Arum: Lomachenko is Intrigued By Prospect of Fighting Gamboa
Collapse
-
Originally posted by HeroBando View PostFor a few rounds but even against subpar comp he's gassing mid fight and running out of ideas. I hope he proves me wrong but I think he's done.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HeroBando View PostI'm again telling you to learn some boxing. Blue chippers get better purses duh
Comment
-
Originally posted by My Low Place View Postwho's getting credit? joshua for that bs klit fight? looooooool
not i dont get their money..but fair deals make fair fights..THAT IS BEST FOR BOXING FANS..
highest pay day doesnt mean most fair..they robbed him and gave him a draw to keep from paying..they politically manipulated him and i stick up for any fighter in that bag..
loma will get credit when bob has to stop stirring his pot to be good
Why don't you blame him?
Gamboa and Walters are two different situations. I don't like the Gamboa fight to happen next, because he hasn't been fighting consistently in the last few years. Walters was actually fighting. He just didn't fight this year.
Gamboa was even inactive going into the Crawford fight.
Yeah, that's right, Crawford fought Gamboa after over a year lay off, but I don't see people complaining about that.
In fact, people give Crawford a lot of credit for beating Gamboa, who was not in his natural weight class by the way. I don't see people saying that Crawford fought Gamboa after a year lay off.
I don't want to see Loma-Gamboa fight next. I agree with that. Gamboa needs a few more fights before I wouldn't mind that fight.
Loma would get no credit from me for beating Gamboa next. I don't want to see that next. Get Gamboa a few fights then I would be open to seeing that fight.
They need to get that Salido fight.Last edited by HI-TECH Boxing; 12-22-2016, 11:46 AM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HI-TECH Boxing View PostWalters could have taken the fight earlier in the year but he didn't.
Why don't you blame him?
lets face it a fight that peaks at 700k on hbo between 2 undefeated fighters doesnt have an A side...both did similar numbers prior to the fight as well..think walters did a few thousand more..and was undefeated..NOTHING SCREAMS THAT GIVING LOMA MORE MONEY IS FAIR...idc if he decline they could have gave him a sosa rematch!! they could have did anything but just sit him onthe damn bench
Comment
-
Originally posted by My Low Place View Postbc his promoter should undervalue him after all the work he's put in for him..and his promoter admitted the offer was too low only to sit him on the bench.
lets face it a fight that peaks at 700k on hbo between 2 undefeated fighters doesnt have an A side...both did similar numbers prior to the fight as well..think walters did a few thousand more..and was undefeated..NOTHING SCREAMS THAT GIVING LOMA MORE MONEY IS FAIR...idc if he decline they could have gave him a sosa rematch!! they could have did anything but just sit him onthe damn bench
Guess what? Walters is no longer undefeated. You care too much about undefeated records. That's why fighters are too freaking scared to test each other.
Are you still a fan of Fortuna after he lost his undefeated record to Jason Sosa? Remember, the Sosa that easily lost to Walters, but was given a gift draw.
I have a theory on why they gave Sosa a draw and it has nothing to do with Lomachenko. It's just a pattern I'm noticing with certain fighters and decisions. I prefer not to say anything more than that, but if you look very carefully you'll see that certain fighters get favored. Unfortunately, Walters doesn't belong on that list of fighters, but neither does Loma.
How come you didn't reply to my Crawford-Gamboa comment? Why can Crawford get credit for beating Gamboa after coming off over a year lay off, but Loma can't get credit for beating Walters coming off an 11 month lay off?
Interesting...
Comment
-
Originally posted by HI-TECH Boxing View PostGuess what? Walters is no longer undefeated. You care too much about undefeated records. That's why fighters are too freaking scared to test each other.
Are you still a fan of Fortuna after he lost his undefeated record to Jason Sosa? Remember, the Sosa that easily lost to Walters, but was given a gift draw.
I have a theory on why they gave Sosa a draw and it has nothing to do with Lomachenko. It's just a pattern I'm noticing with certain fighters and decisions. I prefer not to say anything more than that, but if you look very carefully you'll see that certain fighters get favored. Unfortunately, Walters doesn't belong on that list of fighters, but neither does Loma.
- How come you didn't reply to my Crawford-Gamboa comment? Why can Crawford get credit for beating Gamboa after coming off over a year lay off, but Loma can't get credit for beating Walters coming off an 11 month lay off?
- Interesting
AND YEP I STILL LOVE WATCHING FORTUNA..he goes for it fight whoever they'll give him with no political bs...round 12 of his last fight was soe round of the year type ****..fun fighter..not the best but i respect him
i didnt give crawford huge credit for gamboa..i said he fougth a midget..i'm on record saying i wasnt sold on crawford until he beat post and also his first fight at 140 showed a lot to me vs robert garcia's former fighter...i saw no need for crawford vs boa..i wanted garcia boa and crawford e3ven told gamboa that he shouldnt have even took this fight...REMEMBER??
NO FIGHTER BELONGS ON THAT LIST UNTIL HE PUTS HIMSELF THERE..THAT IS MY PROBLEM WITH LOMA...all these rules are being broken for him and ppl are fine with it
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by kiaba360 View PostGamboa seriously needs a tune-up. Maybe not a tune-up, but going straight to a Lomachenko fight doesn't seem like the smartest thing to do. I'd rather Gamboa vs. Salido 2. A lot has happened since their first fight.
Comment
Comment