Originally posted by jreckoning
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Who else can GGG fight for 10 million?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Mr.DagoWop View PostYou were the one who originally correlated GGG turning down 10 mill with Pac turning down 40 mill. You thought GGG could earn more like Pac did.
You then said some ****** **** about if Mark Zuckerberg should have turned down 10 mill back in 2004. I figured you were bringing that up to help your point and not mine because Zuckerberg ended up selling Facebook for 3.3 billion. You brought up points for both sides of the argument and pretty much shot yourself int he foot so I don't know what you are arguing for now.
So it looks like you completely understand my point. Just like Zuckerberg would be smart not to accept a $10 million deal (even if it may have been more money than he could have gotten at that time), GGG doesn't need to accept $10 mil right now, when realistically, the fight probably gets made anyway at some point in the future and he gets more than $10 mil (albeit when both guys are older).
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Raonic View PostLol weren't you the one talking about reading comprehension.
So it looks like you completely understand my point. Just like Zuckerberg would be smart not to accept a $10 million deal (even if it may have been more money than he could have gotten at that time), GGG doesn't need to accept $10 mil right now, when realistically, the fight probably gets made anyway at some point in the future and he gets more than $10 mil (albeit when both guys are older).
Zuckerberg and Golovkin is not even close to a logical analogy because that would mean that Golovkin would get better as time goes on AND it would also mean that this fight has the potential to be worth billions of dollars.
GGG will get worse as time goes on Canelo won't...at least not in the next year or two which is the time when the fight will happen.
You bringing up Zuckerberg doesn't make sense because Facebook wasn't prime or even past prime in 2004. Matter of fact it doesn't even have a prime because it isn't a fighter! Keep it boxing related not some idiotic analogy.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Mr.DagoWop View PostNow you're posting oxymorons great. According to you I have bad reading comprehension yet I completely understood your point. Makes total sense.
Zuckerberg and Golovkin is not even close to a logical analogy because that would mean that Golovkin would get better as time goes on AND it would also mean that this fight has the potential to be worth billions of dollars.
GGG will get worse as time goes on Canelo won't...at least not in the next year or two which is the time when the fight will happen.
You bringing up Zuckerberg doesn't make sense because Facebook wasn't prime or even past prime in 2004. Matter of fact it doesn't even have a prime because it isn't a fighter! Keep it boxing related not some idiotic analogy.
The fight may not be as exciting in the future, sure, not denying that at all. But the business deal would only get better in favour of GGG in a few years from now. For all Mark knows, Facebook may have been near peak and could've declined soon after so he could have cashed out.
Comment
-
Originally posted by i got the keys View PostNobody. He backed out of the fight with Ward because he wanted to do it at 164, yet he would fight JCCjr and Froch at 168.
Biased fools can pick whichever option they prefer.
One thing for sure though, GGG and Ward wouldn't have shared $10 million between them.
Comment
Comment