Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fury has been charged with doping officially

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #71
    Originally posted by BigZ44 View Post
    Lol. This whole situation is getting out of hand. I just want this resolved one way or the other and to move on it. And LMAO at some of the conspiracy theorists here blaming the ***s and what not. I'll tell you what's going on, it's probably that damn dirty bastard Oquendo, he spiked Fury's and Browne's tests, kidnapped Chagaev and forced him to retire and probably threatened to kill Luis Ortiz's family if he fights Ustinov. Get ready for Wlad/Oquendo for all the marbles LMAO!!!
    Honestly at this point this seems as reasonable as whats going on.

    How the f#ck did Fury not get suspended months before the Klitschko fight happened after supposedly testing positive?

    If the UKAD was helping cover this up for some reason, why aren't they covering it up now?

    If Hughie tested positive why wasn't he suspended at least?

    This situation seems to be one of the more sketchy PED situations all around in boxing ever.

    Comment


      #72
      Originally posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
      Lets believe the team that tried to hide the failed drug test and suspension from the public and fans. Hughie had an illness, Tyson hurt his ankle at exactly the same time they got suspended? GTFO you gullible fool.
      They didn't try to hide it, numbnuts. They were only charged and suspended on June 24 and the first thing they did was start a court action themselves against UKAD. The court has already orderd UKAD to lift the suspension, so I'd say that's round one to the Furys.

      Comment


        #73
        Originally posted by Eff Pandas View Post
        Honestly at this point this seems as reasonable as whats going on.

        How the f#ck did Fury not get suspended months before the Klitschko fight happened after supposedly testing positive?

        If the UKAD was helping cover this up for some reason, why aren't they covering it up now?

        If Hughie tested positive why wasn't he suspended at least?

        This situation seems to be one of the more sketchy PED situations all around in boxing ever.
        That would be like sweeping dust under the carpet when visitors knock on the door, inviting them in, then pulling the carpet back and saying " Hey, look what I hid under here"

        Comment


          #74
          Originally posted by kafkod View Post
          They didn't try to hide it, numbnuts. They were only charged and suspended on June 24 and the first thing they did was start a court action themselves against UKAD. The court has already orderd UKAD to lift the suspension, so I'd say that's round one to the Furys.
          First thing they did was claim Fury was injured and that was the reason the fight was off, no mention of the suspension for failing a drug test. They then claimed Hughie wasn't fighting because he was ill, again no mention of the suspension for a failed drug test.

          Comment


            #75
            Originally posted by kafkod View Post
            That would be like sweeping dust under the carpet when visitors knock on the door, inviting them in, then pulling the carpet back and saying " Hey, look what I hid under here"
            LOL, but this is what some cats are suggesting.

            I just know a lot of **** isn't making sense to me with this PED situation. If Fury used a PED why was he allowed to fight? Why wasn't this info out til recently?

            Whatever the case with Fury & a PED I think the UKAD needs to be looked into as far as how they do business. If you piss dirty you shouldn't be fighting til your situation is resolved one way or another whoever you are.

            Comment


              #76
              Originally posted by Paulie Walnuts View Post
              First thing they did was claim Fury was injured and that was the reason the fight was off, no mention of the suspension for failing a drug test. They then claimed Hughie wasn't fighting because he was ill, again no mention of the suspension for a failed drug test.
              Fury's injury looked genuine to me and it was also verified by doctors. As for Hughie, his illness has been known about for a long time. He took a year off for it in 2013/14 and that had nothing to do with doping accusations.

              Comment


                #77
                Originally posted by Eff Pandas View Post
                LOL, but this is what some cats are suggesting.

                I just know a lot of **** isn't making sense to me with this PED situation. If Fury used a PED why was he allowed to fight? Why wasn't this info out til recently?

                Whatever the case with Fury & a PED I think the UKAD needs to be looked into as far as how they do business. If you piss dirty you shouldn't be fighting til your situation is resolved one way or another whoever you are.
                It makes no sense to me either mate.

                Comment


                  #78
                  Originally posted by Eff Pandas View Post
                  Honestly at this point this seems as reasonable as whats going on.

                  How the f#ck did Fury not get suspended months before the Klitschko fight happened after supposedly testing positive?

                  If the UKAD was helping cover this up for some reason, why aren't they covering it up now?

                  If Hughie tested positive why wasn't he suspended at least?

                  This situation seems to be one of the more sketchy PED situations all around in boxing ever.
                  It's very strange. Only two explanations that I can think of. The first is that Fury's team challenged the shit out of it behind the scenes, drawing out the pre-hearing process. The second is that UKAD deliberately dragged their feet for reasons unknown.

                  And that's only if the letter Fury received in June was notifying him of the hearing. If that was the charging letter, then it would mean that UKAD did not initiate proceedings until 15 months after the test came back positive. That, if true, is incredible.

                  I guaranteed you Wlad's lawyers are gearing up right now.

                  Comment


                    #79
                    It's obvious at this point that the gays, ***s & ******s have conspired to bring down the gypsy king

                    Comment


                      #80
                      Originally posted by Dr Rumack View Post

                      I guarantee you Wlad's lawyers are gearing up right now.
                      In the sweet words of Peter Peckerwood Fury, 'Amen to That'

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP