Floyd interview on Manny Vs Crawford

[b00g13man]

Fail thread.

[SAN D13GO VILLAN]

Funny thing is that Floyd said the same thing to khan about canelo...

[ahas]

I dont know if this is real, but since it is Floyd.. Id say 50/50.. lol

[Larry the boss]

yea this is from 2015

[KingHippo]

Pac's speed, power, and reflexes will present issues for Bud. You can't give away rounds to him either because he is going to win the close ones anyhow, the judges will give him every single close round.

The right hook will be a tremendous punch for Pac as well. Bud has the ability to hang with Pac but not in the first bout, maybe in a rematch. Gamboa was able touch Crawford up a little bit because of his speed before getting destroyed. Pac is just as fast, probably faster, hits harder, and has tremendous footwork. I can see Bud getting dropped early and losing a few more rounds on inactivity, maybe stealing a round or two but losing in a UD. If he tries to trade with Pac, he is getting taken out.

No he doesn't

[WesternChamp]

This interview was from probably six months back and Floyd did not pick on Crawford. All he said was that beating Manny Pacquiao is not an easy task. He warned Crawford not to underestimate him.

he's lowkey saying that crawford doesnt have what it takes to beat manny. whether he's saying it out of jealousy or not but where's the support at? you would think floyd would urge crawford to take on manny and tell crawford he can beat manny. instead floyd said the opposite. this is just like what broner said about floyd. instead of giving props, he puts the other guy down.

[WesternChamp]

Fail thread.

so this interview is fake then?

[Johnwoo8686]

he's lowkey saying that crawford doesnt have what it takes to beat manny. whether he's saying it out of jealousy or not but where's the support at? you would think floyd would urge crawford to take on manny and tell crawford he can beat manny. instead floyd said the opposite. this is just like what broner said about floyd. instead of giving props, he puts the other guy down.

You guys are not that sharp. Floyd is telling Crawford NOT to underestimate Manny. That's not putting a guy down. Crawford hasn't fought anyone near as talented or as accomplished as Manny, he also doesn't have over 20 years of experience like Floyd has. So beating Manny will be a difficult task.

And why would you listen to a fool like Broner? He's had just as many legal problems as Floyd and he's only 27 years old without the same accomplishments.
Floyd has said in past interviews he hopes a fighter will surpass him.

[The Big Dunn]

he's lowkey saying that crawford doesnt have what it takes to beat manny. whether he's saying it out of jealousy or not but where's the support at? you would think floyd would urge crawford to take on manny and tell crawford he can beat manny. instead floyd said the opposite. this is just like what broner said about floyd. instead of giving props, he puts the other guy down.

you really can't be serious. this is what you took from this interview?

I think you are trying way too hard to fit this into a certain narrative.

[WesternChamp]

]You guys are not that sharp. Floyd is telling Crawford NOT to underestimate Manny. That's not putting a guy down[/B]. Crawford hasn't fought anyone near as talented or as accomplished as Manny, he also doesn't have over 20 years of experience like Floyd has. So beating Manny will be a difficult task.

And why would you listen to a fool like Broner? He's had just as many legal problems as Floyd and he's only 27 years old without the same accomplishments.
Floyd has said in past interviews he hopes a fighter will surpass him.

how so? remember what floyd said about pac? one dimensional, easy work?

why is it so hard for you to see that floyd act sour around guys who have the potential to be the next star?

im not listening to broner, im pointing out what broner said about how floyd doesnt give praise but put the fighter down instead, which is true.

look at other boxers, they are picking crawford to beat pac, some is actually telling pac to avoid crawford and to stay retired instead.