<#webadvjs#>

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

So Golovkin beat Saunders

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
    #41
    Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
    That is irrelevant. The duration doesn't matter. It was either vacant or it wasn't. In this case, it was.

    This is a fairly simple concept to grasp.
    Even simpler would be to just answer the question. 1-2 words max. Give it a try?

    Comment

      #42
      Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
      Even simpler would be to just answer the question. 1-2 words max. Give it a try?
      Ok. At the very minimum, it was vacant for 0 nanoseconds.

      It was still vacant, and that's the point. Now are you going to admit you were wrong?

      Comment

        #43
        Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
        Ok. At the very minimum, it was vacant for 0 nanoseconds.

        It was still vacant, and that's the point. Now are you going to admit you were wrong?
        Sure as long as I get that fat asterisk next to vacant belt. Needs to say "vacant for 0.00s ie surrendered"

        Comment

          #44
          People with something to lose have avoided GGG.

          Martinez was the start. He went for money like most of them are doing

          Comment

            #45
            Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
            Sure as long as I get that fat asterisk next to vacant belt. Needs to say "vacant for 0.00s ie surrendered"
            Whatever you try to label it as doesn't change the fact he was handed the title and didn't win the title.

            Comment

              #46
              Originally posted by Isaac Clarke View Post
              Whatever you try to label it as doesn't change the fact he was handed the title and didn't win the title.
              No he had Canelo give him his belt to become boxings laughing stock

              Comment

                #47
                Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
                Sure as long as I get that fat asterisk next to vacant belt. Needs to say "vacant for 0.00s ie surrendered"
                The length of time a belt was vacant doesn't make it any more meaningful. A vacant belt is a vacant belt.

                Comment

                  #48
                  Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
                  The length of time a belt was vacant doesn't make it any more meaningful. A vacant belt is a vacant belt.
                  It does, intent matters. Here the intent was to duck, clear as day, hence 0.00s vacancy

                  Comment

                    #49
                    Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
                    It does, intent matters. Here the intent was to duck, clear as day, hence 0.00s vacancy
                    I know your deep love for GGG is hindering your cognitive ability right now, so I'll try and let this one slide.

                    Comment

                      #50
                      Originally posted by b00g13man View Post
                      I know your deep love for GGG is hindering your cognitive ability right now, so I'll try and let this one slide.
                      Well you're trying to sell this as some lame vacant belt while the rest of the world is laughing at Canelo forfeiting the belt.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP