No matter what any fighter says (Lara wants to fight GGG) or does (Ward sending offer) the only excuse GGG fans will accept is that someone is ducking him. Why not call Lara's bluff then?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Lara: Canelo Showed His Fear, I'll Fight Golovkin at Full 160
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by New England View Postnot calling him a bum. i am mostly calling him a JMW, and pointing out that hes looked far from unbeatable there. there's, at the very least, a lot left for him to prove at 154 before he's seen as the guy gennady golovkin has to fight.
his fight with molina was actually a draw, IIRC. he didn't do much at all to separate himself. had him beating williams by a lot, and he was green and showed balls in that fight dealing with that insane swelling. pretty decent win. but williams had been taking bombs in victory and defeat for years at that point. he was coming off of a knockout of the year loss to martinez at MW.
the canelo fight was damn close, and outside of the trout win you have to consider it his most valuable performance in terms of adding to his resume. but it was a loss. you can only call a fight a robbery when it is a robbery, and that fight just wasnt' a robbery.
so you're giving a lot of credit to lara for almost beating the guy who is avoiding golovkin like the plague [canelo.] a win over a significantly faded alfredo angulo. a draw to vanes. a decent win over austin trout. and a win [let's call it a win,] over the guy sergio martinez [who very blatantly ducked golovkin, and who arguably lost to murray, and who went to war with macklin, both of whom golovkin destroyed,] knocked totally unconscious in paul williams.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Beercules View PostPac moved up 8 weight classes.
Canelo has been fighting at 155 since his embarrassing loss to Floyd.
Speaking of embarrassing loss, Pac had a bunch of embarrassing losses himself. One coming at the hands of Floyd. Guess that's why he pussed out of a fight with him for five years.
And you think 97K's loss to Ward would've been as embarrassing?
Comment
-
Screw it let GGG destroy Lara but the same fanboys that were talking trash saying "Why's GGG avoiding Lara" are then going to say "Lara's small doe"
Comment
-
Originally posted by JStill Unbiased View PostAll fair points but you're missing what I'm getting at. Golovkin will beat Erislandy Lara in my opinion. My point is, he's a more than worthy opponent and will finally be a notable name for Golovkin to tote on his resume. With all the flaws that you want to pick at in Lara, he's still a far better fighter and opponent than anyone Golovkin has ever fought. Let's not escape that. Lara's better than most guys at 160 and he's bringing a solid resume and name with him when/if he enters that division. Let's not escape that.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Death_Adder View PostWay to avoid my question.
Speaking of embarrassing loss, Pac had a bunch of embarrassing losses himself. One coming at the hands of Floyd. Guess that's why he pussed out of a fight with him for five years.
And you think 97K's loss to Ward would've been as embarrassing?
Canelo ducked GGG
Comment
-
Originally posted by GGG Gloveking View PostWill you be happier if we call him a financially motivated duck? This isnt WSJ or Forbes, some of us could give a **** azz about purse splits and PPV numbers. We want to see good fights. Canelo wasnt crying about deadlines or splits when he was acting all macho in the ring with his "I'll fight right now...we dont F around in Mexico" talk. Where is all that now?
Comment
-
Originally posted by torosboxing75 View PostI wouldn't be so sure. I mean the guy was getting dropped by freakin Angulo. lemieux is far tougher then Angulo. If Lara had that much trouble with Angulo, Lemieux would @160 Lemieux would finish him.
GGG beating Lara holds more weight than GGG beating Lemuix it's not even a debate!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Beercules View PostCanelo didn't want it
Born ready doe
Party now Goloctards, the party will be over soon, just watch. Celebrate your moral victory, if that's what you see it as?
This reminds me of when the Pac turds were hanging onto the fantasy win over Floyd.
In the interim, one of those "ranked mandatories" are knocking on the door.
Comment
-
Originally posted by torosboxing75 View PostScrew it let GGG destroy Lara but the same fanboys that were talking trash saying "Why's GGG avoiding Lara" are then going to say "Lara's small doe"
Comment
Comment