Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why is Lara/GGG a no go cuz of politics but not GGG/Jacobs?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #71
    Originally posted by Redd Foxx View Post
    Lol @ how the excuses change. First, it was because they "can't" fight, now Lara (who has a better resume than Ggg by far) has to spend time at 160 first. Fekkn insecure fans protecting their idol from harm....
    If you like Golovkin then you should want to see him in real fights.
    Lara is one of the most skilled pure boxers in the sport, but GGG gives him a beating, the type of violence that would make Lara consider retirement. He would get badly hurt.

    Comment


      #72
      Originally posted by about.thousands View Post
      Ratings don't equal subscribers. If ratings were as important on premium cable as it is on network and basic cable HBO would've canceled boxing long ago. Read the above article I posted on why the ratings aren't as important to premium networks as subscribers are. And boxing doesn't bring subscribers because it's too infrequent. They want long-term subscribers and new subscriptions. A boxing show can get 5 viewers as long as 3 of those viewers are new subscribers HBO is happy.
      Your a moron.

      Comment

      Working...
      X
      TOP