Originally posted by Fetta
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
I'm still puzzled as to how Floyd managed to retire undefeated
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by saint laurentThose painting Mayweather as someone who avoided top opponents are the ones twisting reality. Roy Jones had a great career, but a fighter with EIGHT losses is not relevant in a discussion about how difficult it is to retire undefeated and before you blame the losses on Roy fighting on too long, half of his losses were when he was younger than the age Floyd retired at.
As for the first fights with Castillo and Maidana, the fights were close, as fights often are in boxing. He won the fights on the scorecards and the associated press had him winning both fights as well. He then gave both fighters rematches and beat them more convincingly. I have no interest in a conversation that takes place in an alternate reality. Floyd won the fights, so if you want to pretend that he didn't, you are free to have any fantasy conversation you want, with yourself, in your own play pen.
No matter how you slice it, nobody retired undefeated with a more impressive resume than Floyd. Please tell me who else could have gone through this gauntlet without a loss:
GENARO HERNANDEZ
ANGEL MANFREDY
DIEGO CORRALES
JESUS CHAVEZ
JOSE LUIS CASTILLO (TWICE)
ARTURO GATTI
ZAB JUDAH
OSCAR DE LA HOYA
RICKY HATTON
JUAN MANUEL MARQUEZ
SHANE MOSLEY
MIGUEL COTTO
ROBERT GUERRERO
SAUL ALVAREZ
MARCOS MAIDANA (TWICE)
MANNY PACQUIAO
Comment
-
Originally posted by Vadrigar. View Post1. I don't consider Calzaghe to be in the ****y/arrogant category.
2. Calzaghe didn't fight the same amount of top level fighters that Floyd did.
It's far from easy. In 19 years Floyd was did not even slip once.
just wondering.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ray* View PostGuess #48 would have done the same if it was that "Easy"
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Vadrigar. View PostThroughout history all brash, c*cky, arrogant champions have eventually been humbled after accumulating a long undefeated streak. All the way from Muhammad Ali to Mike Tyson to Roy Jones and most recently Ronda Rousey.
How the hell did this sneaky ****er slip through the cracks while continuing to remain so odious?
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by saint laurentThose painting Mayweather as someone who avoided top opponents are the ones twisting reality. Roy Jones had a great career, but a fighter with EIGHT losses is not relevant in a discussion about how difficult it is to retire undefeated and before you blame the losses on Roy fighting on too long, half of his losses were when he was younger than the age Floyd retired at.
As for the first fights with Castillo and Maidana, the fights were close, as fights often are in boxing. He won the fights on the scorecards and the associated press had him winning both fights as well. He then gave both fighters rematches and beat them more convincingly. I have no interest in a conversation that takes place in an alternate reality. Floyd won the fights, so if you want to pretend that he didn't, you are free to have any fantasy conversation you want, with yourself, in your own play pen.
No matter how you slice it, nobody retired undefeated with a more impressive resume than Floyd. Please tell me who else could have gone through this gauntlet without a loss:
GENARO HERNANDEZ
ANGEL MANFREDY
DIEGO CORRALES
JESUS CHAVEZ
JOSE LUIS CASTILLO (TWICE)
ARTURO GATTI
ZAB JUDAH
OSCAR DE LA HOYA
RICKY HATTON
JUAN MANUEL MARQUEZ
SHANE MOSLEY
MIGUEL COTTO
ROBERT GUERRERO
SAUL ALVAREZ
MARCOS MAIDANA (TWICE)
MANNY PACQUIAO
Besides that, Mayweather's resume doesn't compare to Leonard's revenge win over Duran, beating Thomas Hearns, and finally Marvin Hagler.
Thomas Hearns at Welterweight and Marvin Hagler at Middleweight are both top 5 in those divisions all-time. Hearns, I'd argue, was the best welterweight boxer (but that wouldn't be fair to ATG Robinson).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View PostYou can't deny he's a very talented fighter, one of the best of all time.
He has a fighting style that first and foremost avoids risk. Plus you could say he chose the right fights at the right times towards the end of his career.
But realistically, no one around his weight was better than him.
He just has a style that is incredibly difficult to beat, even if he doesn't win spectacularly. He did have some good matchmaking towards the end when he had the power to do it, but he did come through the proper way and take hard fights early on.
Basically he is just the best around his weight classes because he was stylistically hard to beat and there was nobody good enough to do it.
But look at those list of names on his record. To turn up for 49 fights always completely focused even through things like upcoming jail times, in great shape, never have an off-night, never walk into a shot and get KO'd etc. it's an incredible thing to do and almost impossible.
He just had a real knack for not losing...rather than a knack for going out and winning, if that makes sense.
Comment
Comment