Adrien Broner > Golovkin

[HeroBando]

How bout a 175 or 172 version of porter or maidana?

No, he'd win those easy. Would be fun fights though.

[STAX ON DECK]

Broner fans watching Maidana fight round 2

i was on the verge of a panci attack and i dont even kno what a panic attack is

[IronDanHamza]

Yea, your right. PDL ******!








GTFOH.

He didn't "suck" but he wasn't really that good was he?

Obviously no where near a "great figjter" he lost the majority of times he stepped up.

[Slick_Rick]

Easily GGG.

Broner resumes is one of the worst resume for a world champion let, alone 4 times world champion. He characterises what is wrong with boxing when a fighter can be involved in so many title fights, when he has lost every time he has stepped up.

Power of the Haymon.

[Kenchiro]

How can you even compare ggg n broner? The porter n maidana is ggg's Lemieux of the world. I think that about sums it up.

[M Bison]

GGG has the better career and resume, fighting good opponents and losing doesn't equate to having a better resume.

However that said Broner and GGG are alike both are willing to take on the hard fights of their respected weight division unlike some guys.

[Syf]

First off..oh man...I don't if you're playing along...but Rigo's ''hook'' bit was sarcasm.... we were talking about crosses...

2nd, Lemieux is supposedly a well conditioned fighters. Has a lot of energy to go 12 rounds and still lay bombs with hooks... therefore, instead of exerting all the energy from hooks he had missed and right hand jabs, he could'Ve just came forward with the repetitive left and jabbing and finish the right cross execution like he DID, and thus, just being active and busy. GGG didn't even counter attack on all those attempts. Therefore, do the math going 12...at least not a UD.

Now you're saying, ''Lara,'' when I clearly just gave an example about K2 and Sanchez stating in the last 2 years that they can take 154 or 168 fighters...so I don't know what failed attempt of a claim you state. Why you had to open your mouth about being some poster here for years putting others in their place is just as 1 dimensional like all other failed posts from people with longevity around here as well.

Erm... you're sarcasm failed.

So first I was brand new, now I'm one dimensional? Sounds to me like you're trying to drag me down to your level.

You're whole strategy is 1 dimensional. It is for 3 reasons:

1. You assume Lemieux can land the 1-2 with consistency, despite his inability to find a rhythm against GGG.

2. You assume Lemieux can do this despite having GGG's excellent jab in his face.

3. Unlike the Cuban fighters you so admire, you're understanding of a fight is static. Adaptability should be the quality you consider, yet you are projecting that if Lemieux had just "stayed busy" and gone ham on 1-2's down the pipe, that GGG wouldn't have timed him and stopped him even earlier. You see, opening up more opens YOU up more. By its nature, a cross is thrown less often because it opens you up more for counterattack. Against skill, people try to find their spots. Solely tape watchers often forget.... the other guy's arsenal is coming at YOU too.

Reality: there is NOTHING Lemieux could have done to beat GGG, shy of loading his gloves or bringing in a ball bat. GGG was the superior fighter in every way with more durability, power, boxing iq, and fundamentals. Fact of the matter is Lemieux had sporadic success with the cross because..and only because.. he threw it sporadically. Consistent cross throwing would become predictable. And predictable is lights out in boxing, guy.

You hold resentment at me for tabbing my longevity, but I said nothing of the sort until you decided to throw disrespect my way. This is called cause and effect, kid. I was also keeping my opinion about your video to myself... but cause and effect. You only have yourself to blame. Next time maybe you won't go throwing disrespect so easily around here, because there ARE guys that know more than you and will make you look like a fool.




One parting shot though you are out on your feet already...

You bring up GGG fighting Lara at 154..even allude to GGG ducking Lara...

No no. I have never brought up a GGG vs Ward, or GGG vs Maidana, or a GGG vs Cotto or Alvarez hypothetical bout. I don't care about any of that. I've only spoken of 160 opposition. I only tag along authentic gossip when it's a known fact that Sanchez & K2 in the last 2 years have called out 154 and 168 opposition for publicity yet never owned up to it.....

Contradicting yourself but hey...they called out Floyd. Or possibly Pac. At 154. That was the intent. GGG MAY drain himself down to Canelo weight if Canelo wins. What incentive does GGG have to put his body through hell making weight to fight Lara? I'm sure if Lara comes up to 160 GGG will be more than happy to accommodate pasting him on a highlight reel for a tape watcher like you to agonize over.

~Finito

[alexguiness]

My boy AB needs to stay far away from that whiteboy cracker.

[Lester Tutor]

Erm... you're sarcasm failed.

So first I was brand new, now I'm one dimensional? Sounds to me like you're trying to drag me down to your level.

You're whole strategy is 1 dimensional. It is for 3 reasons:

1. You assume Lemieux can land the 1-2 with consistency, despite his inability to find a rhythm against GGG.

2. You assume Lemieux can do this despite having GGG's excellent jab in his face.

3. Unlike the Cuban fighters you so admire, you're understanding of a fight is static. Adaptability should be the quality you consider, yet you are projecting that if Lemieux had just "stayed busy" and gone ham on 1-2's down the pipe, that GGG wouldn't have timed him and stopped him even earlier. You see, opening up more opens YOU up more. By its nature, a cross is thrown less often because it opens you up more for counterattack. Against skill, people try to find their spots. Solely tape watchers often forget.... the other guy's arsenal is coming at YOU too.

Reality: there is NOTHING Lemieux could have done to beat GGG, shy of loading his gloves or bringing in a ball bat. GGG was the superior fighter in every way with more durability, power, boxing iq, and fundamentals. Fact of the matter is Lemieux had sporadic success with the cross because..and only because.. he threw it sporadically. Consistent cross throwing would become predictable. And predictable is lights out in boxing, guy.

You hold resentment at me for tabbing my longevity, but I said nothing of the sort until you decided to throw disrespect my way. This is called cause and effect, kid. I was also keeping my opinion about your video to myself... but cause and effect. You only have yourself to blame. Next time maybe you won't go throwing disrespect so easily around here, because there ARE guys that know more than you and will make you look like a fool.




One parting shot though you are out on your feet already...

You bring up GGG fighting Lara at 154..even allude to GGG ducking Lara...



Contradicting yourself but hey...they called out Floyd. Or possibly Pac. At 154. That was the intent. GGG MAY drain himself down to Canelo weight if Canelo wins. What incentive does GGG have to put his body through hell making weight to fight Lara? I'm sure if Lara comes up to 160 GGG will be more than happy to accommodate pasting him on a highlight reel for a tape watcher like you to agonize over.

~Finito

I see...you think I'm expressing that Lemieux won....ok. Like I said, 2016 is great year. And watch for my next video about to be uploaded!

[-MEGA-]

How can you even compare ggg n broner? The porter n maidana is ggg's Lemieux of the world. I think that about sums it up.

No. The Andre Ward and kovalev's would represent the porter and maidana of ggg career. ggg won't step up though to face them...