are you implying that eubank jr is better than lemieux? on paper he's barely even better than monroe jr
Oh i think he is a lot better than Lemiuex but if he isn't then he isnt but in the boxing world of belt after belt afterbelt Eubank has some version of something so why not
Oh i think he is a lot better than Lemiuex but if he isn't then he isnt but in the boxing world of belt after belt afterbelt Eubank has some version of something so why not
Only paper i pay attention to is my money.
Lemieux had a full belt, Eubank Jr just has a paper version of Golovkin's belt so even in terms of titles held he wouldn't be a better opponent than Lemieux was.
According to an article on here he's getting stripped of his title soon and it's going to Alfonso Blanco, so Eubank won't even bring that to the table. Even if Golovkin tried to unify all the WBA belts, the WBA would just create more, so there's no point.
Lemieux had a full belt, Eubank Jr just has a paper version of Golovkin's belt so even in terms of titles held he wouldn't be a better opponent than Lemieux was.
According to an article on here he's getting stripped of his title soon and it's going to Alfonso Blanco, so Eubank won't even bring that to the table. Even if Golovkin tried to unify all the WBA belts, the WBA would just create more, so there's no point.
WBA, WBC, IBF, Interim,full,super to many belts to care but Eubank isnt a bad fighter to go after if he wants to fight 4 times a year and hes calling him out at his class. Dont see problem here.
Eubank could pan out as a top MW in another year or two, he has great speed and power and seemingly a good chin, but he lacks fundamentals or deep experience. He gets in trouble with Golovkin he'll fold.
Comment