Yeah we should make a movie called "A Pact@rd's Mind" about Rath, Adp & spoon being hired by an imaginary Philippine government agent to investigate the vast murican conspiracy to destroying a national hero.
you be gone if you can not answer the question and comeback some weeks back and spew your smartness.
you be gone if you can not answer the question and comeback some weeks back and spew your smartness.
You seem to have trouble answering the question slip's been asking; where's the investigation? I just decided to stop wasting my time with obsessed pact@rds who lack logic or common sense.
Now go ahead and ask for a video for the five thousandth time and keep waiting for the smoking gun to make your pathetic life make sense again.
Oh...has it been confirmed that floyd used peds? No? Thought so. Stfu and go away. Floyd retired, delete your account, you no longer serve any purpose around here.
U.S. attorneys usually decline to announce the end of an investigation, experts say, because there is always the possibility more evidence could come to light.
Investigators from these agencies began looking into Mr. Armstrong and his United States Postal Service cycling team in the spring of 2010, following allegations by former teammate Floyd Landis. While doping isn’t a crime, federal prosecutors looked at whether Mr. Armstrong may have defrauded sponsors, including the United States Postal Service, by conspiring to cheat. Several of the contracts between Mr. Armstrong’s former cycling team and its sponsors, which were reviewed by the Journal, contained language prohibiting the use of banned substances. The Journal previously reported that Mr. Armstrong and officials on his team told sponsors the team did not engage in doping.
Can we stop the comparisons to Lance?
Even in the Armstrong case, the U.S. Government decided to let it go. His rep is shot.
Boxing is a dirty sport. Cycling is in a completely different situation. Like baseball & football.
Here is a link to time ****zine. Focus on the words sponsor & fraud.
Really? Is it that different that people need to stop bringing it up? I do not think so. In fact, this needs to be discussed WAY MORE!!!
Why? Maybe you are not aware but Lance was accused of cheating way before this article or investigation. And? Well, it goes to show you at what lengths athletes go to cheat and also how many times they "tried" to pin Lance down unsuccessfully until his own teammates brought him down.
You say, still there are differences? Sure, there are but just like Floyd fans and the rest are seeing the Floyd IV scandal differently, so were opposing fans back then. Look at that article for instance. That article is written more from a fan point of view than someone just pointing out the facts. The guy sounded like a Floyd fan in this thread. Quite pathetic! He must feel pretty dumb after Lance revealed to the world that he was a PEDs cheat.
This article comes full circle and you need to understand it clearly in that just like Al Capone, they tried to bring down Lance every which way possible because the "right" people had no will to do it. They all were in a bubble like in this thread and saying "Lance never tested positive so he is innocent". "Investigations turned up nothing so Lance is innocent."
Instead, if you look at it from a different perspective, one will quickly realize what some of us have said. There is enough evidence in the Floyd's case to warrant an investigation. But its different than Lance? Really? Read the article, Lance's history and what I said. It actually has more similarities than you are realizing.
There is evidence that Floyd was not severely dehydrated. There were written statements by qualified NSAC doctors that checked him out at the same time that Floyd had this supposed emergency.
But you still do not get it? You still do not see the similarities? Well, there is more than one way to get an investigation going. Lance had several investigations and they all took different angles/approaches. In that article and what happened with Manny Pacquiao is just how this investigation can get started, as an example, for Floyd. Floyd should be accused of perjury for one. Then go from there. If he was so severely dehydrated, why was it not on the pre-fight form? Then from there, they can and will find out that Floyd never really needed to get an IV, according to the rules themselves. Then its down hill for Floyd. Read the article. That is one way they tried to get Barry Bonds.
Finally, the bottom line, the investigations always were trying to look at the possibility of if Lance cheated. Bonds cheated and yes, if there is one, if Floyd cheated. They were all in denial. Their fans were in denial. They kept on saying over and over again that there is nothing there because there is nothing there. Sure that is the case ..... if you do not look in the right places!
Really? Is it that different that people need to stop bringing it up? I do not think so. In fact, this needs to be discussed WAY MORE!!!
Why? Maybe you are not aware but Lance was accused of cheating way before this article or investigation. And? Well, it goes to show you at what lengths athletes go to cheat and also how many times they "tried" to pin Lance down unsuccessfully until his own teammates brought him down.
You say, still there are differences? Sure, there are but just like Floyd fans and the rest are seeing the Floyd IV scandal differently, so were opposing fans back then. Look at that article for instance. That article is written more from a fan point of view than someone just pointing out the facts. The guy sounded like a Floyd fan in this thread. Quite pathetic! He must feel pretty dumb after Lance revealed to the world that he was a PEDs cheat.
This article comes full circle and you need to understand it clearly in that just like Al Capone, they tried to bring down Lance every which way possible because the "right" people had no will to do it. They all were in a bubble like in this thread and saying "Lance never tested positive so he is innocent". "Investigations turned up nothing so Lance is innocent."
Instead, if you look at it from a different perspective, one will quickly realize what some of us have said. There is enough evidence in the Floyd's case to warrant an investigation. But its different than Lance? Really? Read the article, Lance's history and what I said. It actually has more similarities than you are realizing.
There is evidence that Floyd was not severely dehydrated. There were written statements by qualified NSAC doctors that checked him out at the same time that Floyd had this supposed emergency.
But you still do not get it? You still do not see the similarities? Well, there is more than one way to get an investigation going. Lance had several investigations and they all took different angles/approaches. In that article and what happened with Manny Pacquiao is just how this investigation can get started, as an example, for Floyd. Floyd should be accused of perjury for one. Then go from there. If he was so severely dehydrated, why was it not on the pre-fight form? Then from there, they can and will find out that Floyd never really needed to get an IV, according to the rules themselves. Then its down hill for Floyd. Read the article. That is one way they tried to get Barry Bonds.
Finally, the bottom line, the investigations always were trying to look at the possibility of if Lance cheated. Bonds cheated and yes, if there is one, if Floyd cheated. They were all in denial. Their fans were in denial. They kept on saying over and over again that there is nothing there because there is nothing there. Sure that is the case ..... if you do not look in the right places!
Lol you guys really are a special kind of losers. Look at the effort. Smh
If a fighter is dehydrated, his blood pressure is likely to be low and his pulse rate high. That wasn’t the case with Mayweather as evidenced by the Nevada State Athletic Commission medical data sheet.
Mayweather’s blood pressure was 118/84. In other words, his systolic blood pressure (pressure when the heart is contracting and pumping blood out) was 118. And his diastolic blood pressure (pressure when the heart is resting between beats) was 84. That’s normal for a professional athlete.
Mayweather’s pulse rate – 60 sitting and 66 standing – was also normal.
Dehydration and Low Blood Pressure
When dehydration is not given immediate and proper care, it may result in more complicated conditions such as hypovolemic shock which results from having low blood pressure. When the body is dehydrated, the blood volume decreases and its pressure against the artery walls is reduced. This causes a sudden drop in blood pressure and reduces the amount of oxygen reaching the body tissues, and when this condition is left untreated, hypovolemic shock can result to fatality.
Dehydration and High Blood Pressure
Dehydration can also cause high blood pressure. This happens when our bodies are not getting sufficient amount of water and it then compensates by undergoing sodium retention – which is directly related to high blood pressure. If this is not given proper attention, the body will then close some capillary beds which cause increased blood pressure and raise the pressure on the arteries. To prevent these treacherous conditions brought about by dehydration, make sure to have adequate water intake on a daily basis.
Please add links to these facts from doctors.
but Spoon pointed out that Floyd's readings showed that Floyd did not have high blood pressure nor low blood pressure.
I just checked out Floyd's readings. Relatively normal. Nothing out of the ordinary
Mayweather’s blood pressure was 118/84
"Congratulations! Your Blood Pressure is within the normal limits for your age group. You seem to have a Normal Blood Pressure and you are NOT at risk for Hypertension (high blood pressure)."
Comment