WADA cleared Jon Jones and he had lower ratios than Floyd , you people need to question and compare as there are many test results available from different athletes , Hauser is an extremist with an axe to grind .
-
-
-
What are you talking about?Originally posted by Reloaded View Post
Those ratios bring up red flags. The reason why he was cleared is because he passed other tests (CIR testing).
Even then, people like Conte still think its highly su****ious and that he should be placed under a watch list (targeted). So in other words, Conte is thinking that even though he passed the CIR test, it does not mean that he did not cheat. It just means that since they rely so much on their CIR testing and he passed that, they need to consider him clean even though his ratios are highly su****ious and possibly still cheating in a way that they are not aware of.Comment
-
Floyd was cleared by CIR testing , it states CIR testing will detect any synthetic testosterone .Originally posted by ADP02 View Post
Conte was the one that recommended CIR testing .Comment
-
Can somebody post a link to any Pacquiao test results Id like to see the numbers but cannot find a single result of his anywhere .Comment
-
There was no EPO testing in those days , Armstrong would be caught today if he had the same tests Floyd had , thats how things advance by learning from mistake , Armstrong made it so testing is so much harder today .Originally posted by Rath View Post
You people are so full of sht go do some research .Comment
-
Wrong.Originally posted by Reloaded View Post
There was definitely EPO testing during Armstrong's era. He was an expert at passing the EPO test.Comment
-
Yes your right it was introduced in 2000 but was nowhere near as sophisticated as today .Originally posted by Vadrigar. View PostComment
-
Conte said this:Originally posted by Reloaded View Post
Although the CIR tests would be able to detect if Jones had been using exogenous testosterone, Conte remains skeptical not only of the champion’s low overall levels, but of the great variance in Jones?T/E ratios as well.
“If they see a deviation in the T/E ratio of greater than 30 percent, there is something up. That’s a red flag,?Conte explained. If you look at the numbers for Jon Jones, his was basically an 80 percent deviation.
“These are highly su****ious for Jon Jones, in my opinion,?Conte said. “This is the reason that sophisticated anti-doping officials do target testing. So based on what we see here, my opinion is Jon Jones should be on a very short leash and should be random tested here until they sort out why he has these anomalies.?br />
That Jones?levels were as low as they were should raise a red flag, according to Conte, because the use of performance enhancing drugs could be a potential culprit.
?b>The question is what was suppressing his testosterone production for that period of time. Something caused it to go down, and I do not believe it was overtraining,?Conte said. ?b>Exogenous testosterone and other steroids in a period of time, depending on dosage and method of administration, can completely shut your testosterone and epitestosterone levels in urine to 0....The levels being low there can be many explanations. [People say], ‘Well maybe it’s because he was taking *******.?There’s no solid science out there that shows ******* lowers testosterone.
"Typically without using drugs with black males, 50 to 150 would be the normal range [for testosterone], compared to Jon Jones came back his highest level was 4.9. Even on the low end he’s only got 10 percent of that. It’s really, really low,?Conte continued. “It wasn’t just that one time. The first part of December when he tested again the second time it’s still relatively low. Those are in my opinion just highly su****ious, very, very low levels.?/b>Comment
Comment