Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: J. Mayweather: Pacquiao's Story Backfired, No Rematch!
Collapse
-
-
The funny thing about boxing, 2 people watch the exact same thing, but
both those people see something different.
Now one of those people are delusional, they are not seeing the true picture, and end up living a lie and in denial.
Which one are you!? the one that sees reality as it is, or the one in denial, afraid of reality!?
Comment
-
Originally posted by BrometheusBob View PostI think in his FightHype interview he says he doesn't necessarily deny Pac had an injury but didn't want to hear about it. If anything, I think he is more upset that that got so much attention more so than he is su****ious that the injury is fake.
"Absolutely not," Mayweather told Gray when asked if he could detect a problem with Pacquiao's shoulder during the bout. "He was fast. His left hand was fast. His right hand was fast and he was throwing them both fast and strong.
"Excuses, excuses, excuses," continued Mayweather, who remains undefeated in his professional career with 48 wins, no losses and no draws.
"I'm not going to buy into the bull****...and I don't want the public to buy into the bull****. He lost. He knows he lost. I lost a lot of respect for him after all of this."
Comment
-
Team Mayweather are not detectives......so there is nothing wrong with Pacs story, there are no discrepencies.
Floyd will want the rematch, otherwise history will see his win as tainted and he arguably made real hard work of a one armed fighter. Some think Pac would have lost with 2 arms as well. But statisticians saw Pac win 4 rounds with one arm, so double that makes 8 rounds. So a fit Pac wins 8-4
A rematch will tell us more, clear much up.Last edited by hugh grant; 07-16-2015, 01:28 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by radioraheem View PostHe spoke about it with Showtime's Jim Gray.
Can skip to 0:40
Perhaps he believes it, but doubts the seriousness of the injury or the significance of the injury as a factor in the fight. He does go on to suggest that Pacquiao is a good boxer capable of beating many others. (Talks about how he sets traps, said he was better than I expected etc) To me this implies that he thinks he saw some good stuff from Pacquiao, albeit not enough to win with, but enough to suggest that the performance was not hampered by an injury in his opinion.Last edited by BrometheusBob.; 07-16-2015, 01:42 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by hugh grant View PostTeam Mayweather are not detectives......so there is nothing wrong with Pacs story, there are no discrepencies.
Floyd will want the rematch, otherwise history will see his win as tainted and he arguably made real hard work of a one armed fighter. Some think Pac would have lost with 2 arms as well. But statisticians saw Pac win 4 rounds with one arm, so double that makes 8 rounds. So a fit Pac wins 8-4
A rematch will tell us more, clear much up.
I clearly remember Pacquiao throwing right hands. And showing no signs of injury while doing so.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kdee View PostThe funny thing about boxing, 2 people watch the exact same thing, but
both those people see something different.
Now one of those people are delusional, they are not seeing the true picture, and end up living a lie and in denial.
Which one are you!? the one that sees reality as it is, or the one in denial, afraid of reality!?
The younger fans tend to be followers.. they're brainwashed by the commentators and their ****phobic love for Mayweather.. only pointing out the Mayweather action.. and crediting the lateral movement and clinching too much, because it's boxing.. hit and not get hit.. yet when GGG or Canelo (action fighters).. they're the first to be screaming like little bitches when a slugfest breaks out..
I think the judging in boxing needs to be reassessed.. Lara did the same thing to canelo that Mayweather did to Pac.. yet he lost.. I know big names are gonna fill arenas.. but you have to give fair treatment.. the wealthy keep getting wealthy and the poor stay poor.. Mauricio Herrera is a perfect example.. great overall skills.... why isn't he being paid to fight bums? instead of chavez jr.. or danny Garcia..
I would of called May/Pac a draw just to piss everyone off, nobody loses and them make 2 times as much $$..
I also thing commissions should go to a monetary system.. champ worth x amount with 1 contender worth x amount.. that way if you're not ranked nobody wants to fight you cause of your name.. you have to fight ranked guys to get your $$.. you hear me chavez..
also thing that judges have enough time to score a round and write couple sentences on WHY??? see if it matches what actually went down inside the squared circle..
as a true boxing fan.. we're losing the fight with UFC.. thanks to all the greedy people..
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by hugh grant View PostTeam Mayweather are not detectives......so there is nothing wrong with Pacs story, there are no discrepencies.
Floyd will want the rematch, otherwise history will see his win as tainted and he arguably made real hard work of a one armed fighter. Some think Pac would have lost with 2 arms as well. But statisticians saw Pac win 4 rounds with one arm, so double that makes 8 rounds. So a fit Pac wins 8-4
A rematch will tell us more, clear much up.
Comment
Comment