Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: J. Mayweather: Pacquiao's Story Backfired, No Rematch!

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by Xi_ View Post
    no there weren't any close rounds you idiot. learn how to score a boxing match. #48 was 100% and his fake injury was an excuse for getting his ass whooped. nut huggers like you need to accept it.
    your floyd won only 3 rounds (1,5 and 11)

    46-2

    Last edited by boksingero; 07-16-2015, 12:36 PM.

    Comment


      The funny thing about boxing, 2 people watch the exact same thing, but
      both those people see something different.

      Now one of those people are delusional, they are not seeing the true picture, and end up living a lie and in denial.

      Which one are you!? the one that sees reality as it is, or the one in denial, afraid of reality!?

      Comment


        Originally posted by BrometheusBob View Post
        I think in his FightHype interview he says he doesn't necessarily deny Pac had an injury but didn't want to hear about it. If anything, I think he is more upset that that got so much attention more so than he is su****ious that the injury is fake.
        He spoke about it with Showtime's Jim Gray.

        "Absolutely not," Mayweather told Gray when asked if he could detect a problem with Pacquiao's shoulder during the bout. "He was fast. His left hand was fast. His right hand was fast and he was throwing them both fast and strong.

        "Excuses, excuses, excuses," continued Mayweather, who remains undefeated in his professional career with 48 wins, no losses and no draws.

        "I'm not going to buy into the bull****...and I don't want the public to buy into the bull****. He lost. He knows he lost. I lost a lot of respect for him after all of this."

        Comment


          Team Mayweather are not detectives......so there is nothing wrong with Pacs story, there are no discrepencies.
          Floyd will want the rematch, otherwise history will see his win as tainted and he arguably made real hard work of a one armed fighter. Some think Pac would have lost with 2 arms as well. But statisticians saw Pac win 4 rounds with one arm, so double that makes 8 rounds. So a fit Pac wins 8-4
          A rematch will tell us more, clear much up.
          Last edited by hugh grant; 07-16-2015, 01:28 PM.

          Comment


            Originally posted by radioraheem View Post
            He spoke about it with Showtime's Jim Gray.

            Can skip to 0:40

            Perhaps he believes it, but doubts the seriousness of the injury or the significance of the injury as a factor in the fight. He does go on to suggest that Pacquiao is a good boxer capable of beating many others. (Talks about how he sets traps, said he was better than I expected etc) To me this implies that he thinks he saw some good stuff from Pacquiao, albeit not enough to win with, but enough to suggest that the performance was not hampered by an injury in his opinion.
            Last edited by BrometheusBob.; 07-16-2015, 01:42 PM.

            Comment


              Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
              Team Mayweather are not detectives......so there is nothing wrong with Pacs story, there are no discrepencies.
              Floyd will want the rematch, otherwise history will see his win as tainted and he arguably made real hard work of a one armed fighter. Some think Pac would have lost with 2 arms as well. But statisticians saw Pac win 4 rounds with one arm, so double that makes 8 rounds. So a fit Pac wins 8-4
              A rematch will tell us more, clear much up.
              Proof of "one arm?"

              I clearly remember Pacquiao throwing right hands. And showing no signs of injury while doing so.

              Comment


                Originally posted by kdee View Post
                The funny thing about boxing, 2 people watch the exact same thing, but
                both those people see something different.

                Now one of those people are delusional, they are not seeing the true picture, and end up living a lie and in denial.

                Which one are you!? the one that sees reality as it is, or the one in denial, afraid of reality!?
                I can't tell you how many people I've talked to where half say Pac, and half say May.. The older fans tend to credit aggression.. where Pac get's credit for coming forward and making the fight or else we'd see a bigger snoozefest.. instead of a clinchfest... I tend to be more of this breed.. As a boxing fan I have not issue with 7-5 mayweather.. as a action fan.. close rounds I would of favored Manny.. putting him 7-5 up..

                The younger fans tend to be followers.. they're brainwashed by the commentators and their ****phobic love for Mayweather.. only pointing out the Mayweather action.. and crediting the lateral movement and clinching too much, because it's boxing.. hit and not get hit.. yet when GGG or Canelo (action fighters).. they're the first to be screaming like little bitches when a slugfest breaks out..

                I think the judging in boxing needs to be reassessed.. Lara did the same thing to canelo that Mayweather did to Pac.. yet he lost.. I know big names are gonna fill arenas.. but you have to give fair treatment.. the wealthy keep getting wealthy and the poor stay poor.. Mauricio Herrera is a perfect example.. great overall skills.... why isn't he being paid to fight bums? instead of chavez jr.. or danny Garcia..

                I would of called May/Pac a draw just to piss everyone off, nobody loses and them make 2 times as much $$..

                I also thing commissions should go to a monetary system.. champ worth x amount with 1 contender worth x amount.. that way if you're not ranked nobody wants to fight you cause of your name.. you have to fight ranked guys to get your $$.. you hear me chavez..

                also thing that judges have enough time to score a round and write couple sentences on WHY??? see if it matches what actually went down inside the squared circle..

                as a true boxing fan.. we're losing the fight with UFC.. thanks to all the greedy people..

                Comment


                  Pacquiao is a bum and we all knew that when he basically got beat by Marquez 4 times in a row.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by raymosr View Post
                    Pacquiao is a bum and we all knew that when he basically got beat by Marquez 4 times in a row.
                    I'm going guess you're a Flomo.. and even though your fighter got the W.. you're still bitter at Pac? bonified status!!

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by hugh grant View Post
                      Team Mayweather are not detectives......so there is nothing wrong with Pacs story, there are no discrepencies.
                      Floyd will want the rematch, otherwise history will see his win as tainted and he arguably made real hard work of a one armed fighter. Some think Pac would have lost with 2 arms as well. But statisticians saw Pac win 4 rounds with one arm, so double that makes 8 rounds. So a fit Pac wins 8-4
                      A rematch will tell us more, clear much up.
                      has severe shoulder injury, but checks no when asked to disclose any injures. OK

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP