Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Cotto DESTROYED Rodriguez 2 years ago

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #51
    Originally posted by LarryXXX View Post
    And people laughed saying"OH WHO IS RODRIGUEZ" which i agree with..SO WHY THE HELL ARE PEOPLE HYPING LARA FOR BEATING HIM 2 YEARS LATER?This guy literally has not won a fight in 2 years and that was against ****ing Freddy Hernandez for crying out loud
    Who exactly is hyping Lara's win over Rodriguez? Pointless thread based on fiction.

    Comment


      #52
      Originally posted by BMWM3P View Post
      Trout is nothing like Lara, he is a big hard dude that can take abuse. Lara is soft he would get broken down plus believe it or not, Roach has lit a fire under Miguel if he were to rematch Trout it would be a completely different fight.
      Yea he would beat trout cause trout looks like shlt now lol. He can't beat lara

      Comment


        #53
        Originally posted by Mannie Phresh View Post
        I respect that he's calling out the boogeyman , GGG.
        I'd respect it if Lara could actually fight on HBO

        Comment


          #54
          Originally posted by BMWM3P View Post
          LOL soft Lara was getting his ass beat by Angulo any good boxer puncher would beat Lara soft ass.
          And Cotto lost to Austin Trout. He couldn't get past the worst jab of all time.

          Comment


            #55
            Originally posted by krazyn8tive View Post
            What?! Floyds last legit k.o. was against Hatton. Floyd isnt knocking **** out at 154. That being said, you can be elite without knocking fighters out. Example: Floyd. Lara had scores of 120-107 three times. Clean sweep. Albeit against an overmatched foe.
            Rodriguez was a cherry pick fight to make Lara look elite and although he won every round Rodriguez was there for the easy finish. Lara was landing at will because clearly Rodriguez threw defense out the window. This reminded me of Hatton/Pac with Hatton clearly throwing defense out the window and an elite fighter like Pac did what an elite fighter should do in those situations. Another was Canelo/Kirkland where Kirkland didn't give any fucs about defense and Canelo finished him off like he should have. Lara needed to make a statement in there and not a UD victory, he failed.

            Comment


              #56
              Originally posted by PBP View Post
              And Cotto lost to Austin Trout. He couldn't get past the worst jab of all time.

              Trout's jab is truly awful. That wasn't a good look for Cotto.

              Comment


                #57
                Originally posted by joseph5620 View Post
                Trout's jab is truly awful. That wasn't a good look for Cotto.
                Trout had a 6 inch reach over a small Cotto, any jab can look good with that advantage.

                Comment


                  #58
                  Originally posted by Lords View Post
                  Lara has over a 50% KO ratio, Delvin looked like a lost pup in there and Lara needed to go for the EASY kill to show he is elite. Why box a non threat to a 12 round decision when Delvin could have been finished within 3?
                  This why I said Lara showed he was levels above Trout. How come Cotto couldn't do that? It doesn't matter, triangle theories don't work, or whatever theory is going on here, that Lara sucks? That he is not aggressive? IDK what is the argument here. But yeah, Cotto destroyed Rodriguez, and Lara didn't. Lara outclassed and almost decapitated Trout at what point, and Cotto seemed to have fought to a Draw with Trout (IMO, close fight, Trout didn't beat Cotto). So they didn't differently than each other vs common opponents, it happens a lot in boxing, but it means nothing head to head.

                  Originally posted by Lords View Post
                  This was actually a terrible win for Lara IMO. Rodriguez was supposed to make Lara look like an elite fighter but it made him look like only a good fighter. Any elite fighter would have finished Rodriguez off within 3 rounds easy. Going 12 rounds with a guy who showed no defense just shows that Lara isn't elite. Even Floyd would have KO'd this guy in 3 rounds, even at 154.
                  Floyd is not KO'ing any professional 154lb fighter in 12 rounds, let alone 3 rounds. He'd have to have a chin so bad that he makes Khan's look like prime Margarito's chin.

                  Comment


                    #59
                    Originally posted by HanzGruber View Post
                    Yea he would beat trout cause trout looks like shlt now lol. He can't beat lara
                    Trout would give Cotto another boxing lesson.

                    Comment


                      #60
                      Originally posted by joseph5620 View Post
                      Who exactly is hyping Lara's win over Rodriguez? Pointless thread based on fiction.
                      I think he means all the comments and threads about Lara fighting Mayweather, they were non-existent before the Rodriguez fight, but now that he beat Rodriguez all of a sudden it's a must-see match up. I agree with Larry that it's ******. I am just disagreeing with people tryna put down Lara because he didn't Tyson'ed Rodriguez.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP