Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

FAO: Floyd Mayweather Jr. Supporters

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
    Interesting fact; According to The Ring ****zine, Floyd has beaten 9 fighters ranked #1 in the division being fought in (Hernandez, Corrales, Castillo x2, Gatti, Baldomir, Mosley, Canelo, Cotto) Manny Pacquaio will be his 10th, if he wins.
    damn. impressive for floyd.

    too bad we can't use ring rankings for standard reference anymore.

    Comment


      Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
      The rankings matter little to me without context. You went by rankings, remember? Except when it doesn't suit you

      Anyway, handing someone their second straight decisive loss is not that impressive. Decent win, nothing more.
      that's why i'm gonna go off yours.

      list your top 10 130 rankings 2006.

      thank you.

      Comment


        Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
        that's why i'm gonna go off yours.

        list your top 10 130 rankings 2006.

        thank you.
        Still hanging on someone else's opinion to formulate your own?

        Here let me help you then: like the Ring, I agree Mayweather is higher all-time.

        You're welcome

        Comment


          Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
          Still hanging on someone else's opinion to formulate your own?

          Here let me help you then: like the Ring, I agree Mayweather is higher all-time.

          You're welcome

          so what should i refer to morales at 130 in 2006?

          since he's obviously not 2.

          #1? over barrera who beat him?

          do i put pac #2, morales #3? even though morales just beat him?

          #4? #5? put mosquera and barrios higher than morales?


          "IM SO CONFOOS" -Manny Pacquiao

          Comment


            Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
            you still haven't given me your 130 rankings 2006.

            i'm gonna go off your rankings remember?

            what rank should i refer to morales as in 2006?

            since he wasn't 2.
            he WAS number 2:

            Junior Lightweights
            Title Vacant
            1.Marco Antonio Barrera
            2.Erik Morales
            3.Manny Pacquiao
            4.Vicente Mosquera
            5.Yodsanan Sor Nanthachai
            6.Jorge Rodrigo Barrios
            7.Carlos Alberto Hernandez
            8.Alex Arthur
            9.Robbie Peden
            10.Janos Nagy

            Comment


              Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
              so what should i refer to morales at 130 in 2006?

              since he's obviously not 2.

              #1? over barrera who beat him?

              do i put pac #2, morales #3? even though morales just beat him?

              #4? #5? put mosquera and barrios higher than morales?


              "IM SO CONFOOS" -Manny Pacquiao
              You've already told me that you want to use my rankings. I've cut through the loose tape for you since we know what this thread is really about. Floyd is higher on my all-time list than Manny is. And on the Ring's list too. Oh, and on irondan's too. No need to be confused, we're all here to help you get your feeble mind right.

              Comment


                Originally posted by bigjavi973 View Post
                he WAS number 2:

                Junior Lightweights
                Title Vacant
                1.Marco Antonio Barrera
                2.Erik Morales
                3.Manny Pacquiao
                4.Vicente Mosquera
                5.Yodsanan Sor Nanthachai
                6.Jorge Rodrigo Barrios
                7.Carlos Alberto Hernandez
                8.Alex Arthur
                9.Robbie Peden
                10.Janos Nagy

                thanks.


                wait.... you trying to trick me, funny guy you.

                ring ****zine rankings don't count.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Left Hook Tua View Post
                  damn. impressive for floyd.

                  too bad we can't use ring rankings for standard reference anymore.
                  It is impressive for someone who apparently doesn't fight anyone no one in modern history can say they did that. Only fighter who comes close to fighting as many Top 5 ranked fighters (ring ****zine) in the divison being fought at in the past 20 years is Pacquaio.

                  As for Ring, I've been using them as the go-to rankings since, since always really.

                  Back in the good old days, 60's/70's The Ring ****zine was often the only way of finding out who won fights, Aswell as the Newspaper. We didn't have the luxury of having every single fight on TV or if not an illegal Internet stream

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by IronDanHamza View Post
                    It is impressive for someone who apparently doesn't fight anyone no one in modern history can say they did that. Only fighter who comes close to fighting as many Top 5 ranked fighters (ring ****zine) in the divison being fought at in the past 20 years is Pacquaio.

                    As for Ring, I've been using them as the go-to rankings since, since always really.

                    Back in the good old days, 60's/70's The Ring ****zine was often the only way of finding out who won fights, Aswell as the Newspaper. We didn't have the luxury of having every single fight on TV or if not an illegal Internet stream
                    I'm partial to Ring rankings as well. Probably since I grew up with them.

                    That said, it's always good to keep things in context. I remember when they had Pea #1 for far too long. Made Oscar #1 for no real good reason. And so forth and so forth. So while it's good to look back and read, Lord knows I always remember to use my own head too.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by IMDAZED View Post
                      You've already told me that you want to use my rankings. I've cut through the loose tape for you since we know what this thread is really about. Floyd is higher on my all-time list than Manny is. And on the Ring's list too. Oh, and on irondan's too. No need to be confused, we're all here to help you get your feeble mind right.
                      I have Floyd higher at the moment.

                      But whoever wins this Saturday will be ranked higher than the other, in my opinion.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP