Comments Thread For: Roach: Pacquiao a Much Better Boxer Than Mayweather

[mikemurni]

What absolute rubbish !

You dopey twat, I just gave you an example of the exact opposite.

Hopkins > Taylor > Pavlik > Martinez > Cotto.

ALL were lineal champs, and ALL got beaten by a guy who was better than them at that point in time.

Maybe I could understand you struggling with this if I hadn't given you a prime example.

So, according to you, Mayweathers resume at 147 pisses all over Pacs resume at 147, because Mayweather beat the mighty lineal champ Carlos Baldomir..... right ?

Dumba55 !

It boils down to one thing, and one thing only.....

WHO you beat, and WHEN you beat them..... nothing more.

Adding up boxing writer awards, emerald/platinum/diamond girlfriend belts, and worthless lineal titles dont mean shhht.

A lineal title is just the same as any other ABC title..... the holder COULD be the best guy in the division, or he may not be..... big fkn deal.

You are a moron.. the fact that you have the lineal championship, it means that you have not been beaten yet. Prime or not, Cotto deserve to be the best in that division because he beat the guy. That's why he is the ring's #1 guy in that division and he earned it.And it was a great win no matter how much spin you put in it.. And any fighter who beat Cotto right now in that division will deserve mad respect and full credit.

So what is your basis of knowing the best of your division, your own ****in list. Dependent on whether Mayweather fought him or not?. Now that's laughable....lol..

And just to let you know.. Baldomir was a candidate for fighter of the year in 2006 when he was lineal champ.. Pac just beat him because Baldo lost to Floyd...I didn't have a problem with Floyd beating Baldo.. I just dont like the fact that he retired in 2007 after his money fight with Oscar, and then refuse to fight the other live dogs in that division..

Now I know you are such a b!tch so therefore you will always want the last say.. So I am just gonna keep quiet now and wait until May 3. And then I am coming back and revive this ****ing thread so I can rub it on your face (figuratively ofcourse).. I just hope you have the balls to come back to this thread after Pac beats the ***** out of Floyd...

[aboutfkntime]

You are a moron.. the fact that you have the lineal championship, it means that you have not been beaten yet. Prime or not, Cotto deserve to be the best in that division because he beat the guy. That's why he is the ring's #1 guy in that division and he earned it.And it was a great win no matter how much spin you put in it.. And any fighter who beat Cotto right now in that division will deserve mad respect and full credit.

So what is your basis of knowing the best of your division, your own ****in list. Dependent on whether Mayweather fought him or not?. Now that's laughable....lol..

And just to let you know.. Baldomir was a candidate for fighter of the year in 2006 when he was lineal champ.. Pac just beat him because Baldo lost to Floyd...I didn't have a problem with Floyd beating Baldo.. I just dont like the fact that he retired in 2007 after his money fight with Oscar, and then refuse to fight the other live dogs in that division..

Now I know you are such a b!tch so therefore you will always want the last say.. So I am just gonna keep quiet now and wait until May 3. And then I am coming back and revive this ****ing thread so I can rub it on your face (figuratively ofcourse).. I just hope you have the balls to come back to this thread after Pac beats the ***** out of Floyd...

Excellent, exactly what I wanted to hear.

So, according to you.....

Mayweathers 147 resume pisses all over Pacs, no question.....

And, according to you..... Miguel Cotto is a better middleweight than Gennady Golovkin.

And, Adonis Stevenson is a better light-heavy than Sergey Kovalev.

Gotcha !

Thanks for the info bro ^^

And btw, yes, my basis for knowing who the best fighter is comes from understanding the sport..... only casual fans think they need to check boxrec to see who the lineal champ is so that they know who the best guy is in each division.

Once the numerous ABC belts became established, which was a fkn long time ago now, it became up to knowledgable fans to determine who the best fighter is in each division.

Surely you know that Golovkin is a better middleweight than Cotto ?

Surely ?

I am sure you do.

So, why have you decided to confuse the issue by blindly insisting that "insert name here" is the better fighter because back in the day he beat "insert name here"..... when that is clearly not the case.

You know my reasoning and logic is sound..... and there are dozens of examples throughout history where the lineal champ was clearly NOT the best guy in the division..... the only reason why you have decided not to agree with me is because you are a pacstain, and you will defend Mannys lineal "achievement" to the very death

Come on man.

[12TRIBEsRiSe]

you are a moron.. The fact that you have the lineal championship, it means that you have not been beaten yet. Prime or not, cotto deserve to be the best in that division because he beat the guy. That's why he is the ring's #1 guy in that division and he earned it.and it was a great win no matter how much spin you put in it.. And any fighter who beat cotto right now in that division will deserve mad respect and full credit.

So what is your basis of knowing the best of your division, your own ****in list. Dependent on whether mayweather fought him or not?. Now that's laughable....lol..

And just to let you know.. Baldomir was a candidate for fighter of the year in 2006 when he was lineal champ.. Pac just beat him because baldo lost to floyd...i didn't have a problem with floyd beating baldo.. I just dont like the fact that he retired in 2007 after his money fight with oscar, and then refuse to fight the other live dogs in that division..

Now i know you are such a b!tch so therefore you will always want the last say.. So i am just gonna keep quiet now and wait until may 3. And then i am coming back and revive this ****ing thread so i can rub it on your face (figuratively ofcourse).. I just hope you have the balls to come back to this thread after pac beats the ***** out of floyd...

lol why are u calling the guy out of his name over a boxing prediction? Answer me this though

floyd always gets labled a duck but why does no one ever bring up the fact pac didnt fight nate campbell, mark too sharp johnson, rafeal marquez, julio diaz, zahir raheem or tim austin.... Why arent these labled ducks or ever brought up but margarito, paul williams, and every other fight that didnt happen for floyd brought up?