Originally posted by GOD-FR33
View Post
How can you talk about Roy being hyped, when as yet, Kovalev has hardly done anything?
What do you mean "**** his speed?" It would have been a nightmare for Kovalev.
Why do keep making references to Jean Pascal??
Jean Pascal literally doesn't possess even half of Roy's attributes. Kovalev's win over him means nothing. It's completely irrelevant. But if you want to make references to him, the question you should be asking yourself, is:
If Pascal could repeatedly land flush on Kovalev, then would Roy have been able to do?
Roy doesn't train Pascal. He just very briefly entered his camp as an advisor, that's all.
I too would like to know why Kovalev's rematching Pascal. It's absolutely pointless.
Now why don't you compose yourself and come back and have a logical debate?
Comment