Are Al Haymon advised fighter's merely pawns of Al Haymon? What freedoms do Al Haymon fighters get that Top Rank or GB fighters don't get. From what I see these "free agents" are just illegally being promoted or should I say "advised" by Al Haymon, meaning they have no say or credibility in making fights and choosing opponents. Do these guys even want to be in charge of their careers? Was it really there choice to turn down Roc Nation for the ones who were offered opponents? Is it simply the fact that they can duck and pick safe fights while at the same time not taking any responsibility for their match making and still have that status symbol as a "free agent"? What do yall think about this situation? How much power does he really have over Boxer's professional careers that are advised with him? And what is up with Paulie vouching for the Haymon agenda now'a days?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Are Al Haymon advised fighters......
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by Daylyt View Postthey have no freedoms, they have to give up their belts, turn down multimillion dollars deals. They fights bums and in return tarnish their public opinion it is not by accident most of Haymon adivesed fighters are precieved as cowards.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Daylyt View Postthey have no freedoms, they have to give up their belts, turn down multimillion dollars deals. They fights bums and in return tarnish their public opinion it is not by accident most of Haymon adivesed fighters are precieved as cowards.
Comment
-
-
-
Originally posted by Cinci Champ View Postya because top rank matches their fighters so much differently lol
Comment
-
-
They get paid lots of money for bad fights and his business plan seems to be taking a smaller cut but getting the maximum amount of fighters.
The fighters "win" but boxing as a sport doesn't look very good and the model doesn't seem sustainable long term.
Comment
Comment