Rounds 1,2,3 was for lara. Thats no doubt. Canelo certainly won 4,5,12. So they both won 3 clear rounds so in order to have it 117-111. You must have given every other round to Canelo. The other 6 rounds for me were rounds that were close not meaning someone didnt deserve it. I had it 7-5 for lara but I wouldnt complain if u had it the other way 117-111 is disgraceful for that to be the deciding factor martinez isnt fit enough to judge.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Comments Thread For: Examining the Canelo Alvarez-Erislandy Lara Scorecards
Collapse
-
being how hard lara has worked to get here he could of did a lot more but still at best for canelo it was a draw! I had lara by 2 rounds canelo did good body work and lara exchanged at times but lara looked better of the 2. but he knew what he was up against he had to go all out on canleo and pitch a rigo/donaire type shutout or stop him to win
Comment
-
Originally posted by RyunosukeRonin View PostWhat are those scores from? they aren't the judges or even make sense in terms of 10 point must.
Between the official scorecards there was a difference of 2 rounds in gap that's actually not bad compared to other cards I've seen.
2nd was Floyd
3rd was a typo (sorry **** happens) but last night.
Comment
-
red question marks mean round was close.
right man won. lara damaged his career fighting like he was at a track meet. who's going to want to fight him? low rewards .
.....AL .. LA
1......9.....10
2.? 10.....9
3. ? 9 .....10
4. . .10 ....9
5. 10 ....9
6. 10 ....9
7.? 10.....9
8. . .10 ....9
9. . .10 ....9
10.?9 .....10
11.?9 .....10
12. 10 ....9
......116...112
Comment
Comment