Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Examining the Canelo Alvarez-Erislandy Lara Scorecards

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by PBP View Post
    118-109
    114-114
    117-109

    There is 1 tard judge in every Canelo fight
    Nothing tard about it. None of those judges were ever going to score the fight for Alvarez's opponent, no matter what.

    Comment


      #12
      at 117-111 for Canelo. I really want to see that particular scorecard.

      Comment


        #13
        Originally posted by Derranged View Post
        at 117-111 for Canelo. I really want to see that particular scorecard.
        Gave 2 and 4-11 to Alvarez. Ridiculous.

        Comment


          #14
          One in the pocket always. It's a shame that it was pretty much accepted that Lara was gonna have to Rigondeaux Canelo in order to win. It was a close fight either way but that score card is some laughable ****.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Biolink View Post
            One in the pocket always. It's a shame that it was pretty much accepted that Lara was gonna have to Rigondeaux Canelo in order to win. It was a close fight either way but that score card is some laughable ****.
            And that's impossible. Canelo is a good fighter. He's going to win rounds. Not everybody is Floyd.

            Comment


              #16
              The judge that scored it 117-111 was in communication with the judge that gave austin trout 2 rounds in that alvarez fight

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by PBP View Post
                118-109
                114-114
                117-109

                There is 1 tard judge in every Canelo fight
                What are those scores from? they aren't the judges or even make sense in terms of 10 point must.

                Between the official scorecards there was a difference of 2 rounds in gap that's actually not bad compared to other cards I've seen.

                Comment


                  #18
                  Martinez is a WBA/O judge& should not b judging, in reality, a WBC fight...NVSAC needs to do drug tests, on all ring officials, as by his score, Martinez was either on something, or his bias is showing...

                  Comment


                    #19
                    This is my round by round scoring for this fight:

                    Canelo:2,4,7,8,9,12
                    lara:1,3,5,6,10,11

                    i had it a draw but could see sum of the swing rounds going to canelo because of the pressure and body punches, same with lara with sum clean punches here and there in rounds where canelo waited a little too long... I think i scored it down the middle and got the perfect scorecard. I DONT BELIEVE IN EVEN ROUNDS IN PRO BOXING THERE HAS TO BE A CLEAR WINNER EACH ROUND, AND IN CLOSE ROUNDS YOU JUST HAVE TO KEEP IN MIND WHOS REALLY EFFECTIVE FROM THE BEGGINIG TO THE END OF THE ROUND.

                    1 GOOD BODY PUNCH OR 1 GOOD PUNCH TO THE HEAD IN THE LAST 10 SECONDS OF THE ROUND IS SOMETIMES ENOUGH TO SWING THE ROUND IN A FIGHTERS FAVOR.. I PAID CLOSE ATTENTION TO THAT AND SCORED AN UNBIASED CARD... FIGHT WAS REALL CLOSE THOUGH, IT COULD HAVE GONE EITHER WAY..117-111 WAS A JOKE HAD IT BEEN 115-113 CANELO THIS WOULD BE A NON ISSUE AND EVERYONE WOULD MOVE ON...TOO BAD THERE ARE JUDGES THAT HAVE TO STEAL ATTENTION AWAY FROM THE FIGHTERS.
                    Last edited by LouIE G; 07-13-2014, 04:03 PM.

                    Comment


                      #20
                      I think you hit the caps lock button

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP