Do you think Wlad will be remembered as a great?

[Scottie2Hottie]

remembered as great? i doubt it. when i think great, i think tyson, holyfield, ali, marciano, leonard....big names that everyone knows. i think he'll be remembered as great by people who saw him fight (that is if he can unify the belts), but not by our kids.

[Pno]

Even Tyson with his many recent humiliating losses will be remembered as a great due to his power and convincing KOs, as well as his championship reign.

If Wlad overcomes his devistating losses and continues with a solid career, he should at least be remembered for his very high KO %, if I'm right, there aren't that many fighters with over 40 wins above 90% KO...

He won't be forgotten for his gold medal in the olympics.

He probably won't be forgotten by the racists who would pay a doctor to have him removed from their memory.

But if he does end up face first in the canvas a few more times, then yeah, he will probably not be remembered as a "great".

[BLOODSHED]

Don't even equate Tyson and Wlad. Tyson is an all time great. Wlad isn't. You're so pathetic and biased that you tried tearing down Tyson while at the same time opening a window of opportunity for Wlad to be remembered as a great. EXTREMELY ******.

Even Tyson with his many recent humiliating losses will be remembered as a great due to his power and convincing KOs, as well as his championship reign.

If Wlad overcomes his devistating losses and continues with a solid career, he should at least be remembered for his very high KO %, if I'm right, there aren't that many fighters with over 40 wins above 90% KO...

He won't be forgotten for his gold medal in the olympics.

He probably won't be forgotten by the racists who would pay a doctor to have him removed from their memory.

But if he does end up face first in the canvas a few more times, then yeah, he will probably not be remembered as a "great".

[DiegoFuego]

If Wlad somehow unifies all four titles and successfully defends them for 4 years I will consider him great. Until then, you gotta be ****ing joking.

this post sums it up. good post

[Run]

Don't even equate Tyson and Wlad. Tyson is an all time great. Wlad isn't.

Tyson was overrated as a fighter.



| |

[BLOODSHED]

We he was at his peak, (late 80s/early 90s), he was an all time great, however short-lived it was. Wlad still can't touch Tyson's peak. It's a shame to even mention the two in the same sentence.

Tyson was overrated as a fighter.

[DiegoFuego]

If Wlad is remembered as an all-time great, then Vitali will be remembered as an all-time great and that is LAUGHABLE

[Torino]

Are you stuck on ******?

I said "great boxer" not "boxing great". Read again, Mr. Dyslexia.

Ok I'll ask YOU again. Why does he have to beat a boxing great to be a great boxer? Are you denying he has great boxing skills?

I already agreed he's not a boxing great. although he hasn't retired yet.

[Manny_P]

Ok I'll ask YOU again. Why does he have to beat a boxing great to be a great boxer? Are you denying he has great boxing skills?

I already agreed he's not a boxing great. although he hasn't retired yet.

Is Many Pacquiao a "great boxer"? But is he a "boxing great"?

You're effort to go to lengths to support nuthugging towards Klitschkos is pathetic to say the least.


Wlad Klitschko IS NOT GREAT!

[Torino]

Is Many Pacquiao a "great boxer"? But is he a "boxing great"?


Wlad Klitschko IS NOT GREAT!

That's what I said!

???????????

I only said he has great boxing skills