Jermain Taylor vs. Winky Wright on for June!!!

[restless_438]

he dominated all his competition up to hopkins, faced hopkins, and beat him twice. it was not a robbery. the second fight was quite clear imo

god, i don't want to start an argument with anyone (maybe other than Diego cause it's so easy).. my only comment is that Wright will beat Taylor with his skill and experience and i'm not going to let ignorance or bias change my prediction. BTW I thought Taylor won the second fight with Hopkins.

[restless_438]

9 rounds to 3, dont fool yourself with favorism.

"Dominating" might be termed differently for different people.

If someone is dominating to me, is to completely win a fight, leaving absolutely no chance for an opponent to win or look at all good in the least, and that was never the case with either Taylor/Hopkins fight. Taylor was never "dominating" Bernard Hopkins in either of the fights, even though i agreed he won the decision in the 2nd one. Make sure you understand what the word "dominate" means. (examples: Wright dominated Trinidad. Mayweather dominated Gatti.)

[BadMagick]

"Dominating" might be termed differently for different people.

If someone is dominating to me, is to completely win a fight, leaving absolutely no chance for an opponent to win or look at all good in the least, and that was never the case with either Taylor/Hopkins fight. Taylor was never "dominating" Bernard Hopkins in either of the fights, even though i agreed he won the decision in the 2nd one. Make sure you understand what the word "dominate" means. (examples: Wright dominated Trinidad. Mayweather dominated Gatti.)

Just because the judges score it one way doesn't mean that everyone saw it that way. I thought B-Hop won the first fight by a narrow margin, and I never watched the second one (was never able to get a hold of it). Further, just because a fighter wins 9 rounds to 3 doesn't mean that he's dominated everyone of those rounds. They could have all been very close rounds (haven't seen Hop-Taylor II, so I don't know), and, therefore, the losing fighter was not dominated.

At any rate, IDon'tWatchBoxing is a complete ****ing idiot, and everyone knows it. Not a single person here takes what he says seriously, because he just doesn't know what he's talking about.

[restless_438]

Just because the judges score it one way doesn't mean that everyone saw it that way. I thought B-Hop won the first fight by a narrow margin, and I never watched the second one (was never able to get a hold of it). Further, just because a fighter wins 9 rounds to 3 doesn't mean that he's dominated everyone of those rounds. They could have all been very close rounds (haven't seen Hop-Taylor II, so I don't know), and, therefore, the losing fighter was not dominated.

At any rate, IDon'tWatchBoxing is a complete ****ing idiot, and everyone knows it. Not a single person here takes what he says seriously, because he just doesn't know what he's talking about.

thank you...

[RAESAAD]

Just because the judges score it one way doesn't mean that everyone saw it that way. I thought B-Hop won the first fight by a narrow margin, and I never watched the second one (was never able to get a hold of it). Further, just because a fighter wins 9 rounds to 3 doesn't mean that he's dominated everyone of those rounds. They could have all been very close rounds (haven't seen Hop-Taylor II, so I don't know), and, therefore, the losing fighter was not dominated.

At any rate, IDon'tWatchBoxing is a complete ****ing idiot, and everyone knows it. Not a single person here takes what he says seriously, because he just doesn't know what he's talking about.

This is a good post.......Taylor did more in the second fight and since he was the Champ he did not deserve to lose.....Just like Hopkins did not deserve to lose the first fight.The Challenger has to TAKE the title IMO.

[BadMagick]

This is a good post.......Taylor did more in the second fight and since he was the Champ he did not deserve to lose.....Just like Hopkins did not deserve to lose the first fight.The Challenger has to TAKE the title IMO.

I agree. The problem is that Taylor should never have had the belts in the first place, and therefore should not have been able to have that advantage over B-Hop in the second fight.

[RAESAAD]

I agree. The problem is that Taylor should never have had the belts in the first place, and therefore should not have been able to have that advantage over B-Hop in the second fight.

Agreed completely.....

[GunStar]

you are so full of ****

man, I swear to God you talk about Hopkins-Taylor I like it was a ****ing robbery. **** you and your biases

Lol, these Hopkins nuthuggers are still crying about Taylor winning.

[GunStar]

Taylor dominated Hopkins two times. He will beat Winky, and build a nice enough record, he is no chump.

Agreed with you 100%.

[DiEgO_cHiCo_CoRRaLeS]

winky's ganna make taylor look worse than he made tito look!