Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Arum: Crawford More Talented, Dedicated Than Broner

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by HanzGruber View Post
    broner and crawford turned pro in the same year and crawford is 2 years old, broner is way more developed than him. and youre over rating rees' performance lol my god, his trainer wanted to stop it after the 4th round gtfo
    Lol overrating rees performance you are the one comparing let me put it straight to you so you can understand.

    You have the champion fighting a bum small guy like rees yet he looses about 3 rounds ( this was a guy that his so called defense was impenetrable like pbf) and touted as the next pbf.

    Now you have a contender who completely whitewashed a decent opponent you tell me whats more impressive. Being older means you are supposed to be better in boxing now??

    You are the one that starting to compare figthers but crawford has never looked like broner and got hit to much. Crawford doesn't have a fight where boxing analyst and people had him loosing.

    Comment


      Originally posted by hitking View Post
      Like I said, his signature win thus far is Tony Demarco. Who no matter how much you try and discredit him. Hasn't loss to anyone as a world class fighter but Edwin Valero. Who if he wasn't a ****in ******, was gonna be a P4P mainstay. And Broner ****ed him up as bad, or worse than Valero did. So like I've said. Broner is a young fighter, with a lot left to prove. But his early returns a very good.
      Lol demarco was outclassed by valero and linares if it wasnt for linares weak chin he would of lost. Demarco wasn't that great he was a pinching bag but regardless he was a tough customer. But like i said now tell me how did he looked against pdl and malignagie both fights where many had hin loosing??

      Comment


        Originally posted by periks19 View Post
        Lol demarco was outclassed by valero and linares if it wasnt for linares weak chin he would of lost. Demarco wasn't that great he was a pinching bag but regardless he was a tough customer. But like i said now tell me how did he looked against pdl and malignagie both fights where many had hin loosing??
        Dude you're a ****in idiot. Linares wasn't outclassing Demarco and he didn't lose because of aweak chin. He was predictably troubling Tony with his fast hands, but was eventually walked down by a stronger fighter.

        As for Ponce and Paulie. Only dip****s like yourself thought Broner lost to Paulie. Most writers ringside had Broner winning 8-4 or 9-3. And anyone with half an ounce of sense as o how to judge a fight had it scored similarly. I have no issues with a judge sitting ringside with one view and one angle of the fight getting it wrong sometimes. But someone sitting at home with a perfect view of what's happening at alltimes shouldn be that ******.

        Comment


          Originally posted by hitking View Post
          Dude you're a ****in idiot. Linares wasn't outclassing Demarco and he didn't lose because of aweak chin. He was predictably troubling Tony with his fast hands, but was eventually walked down by a stronger fighter.

          As for Ponce and Paulie. Only dip****s like yourself thought Broner lost to Paulie. Most writers ringside had Broner winning 8-4 or 9-3. And anyone with half an ounce of sense as o how to judge a fight had it scored similarly. I have no issues with a judge sitting ringside with one view and one angle of the fight getting it wrong sometimes. But someone sitting at home with a perfect view of what's happening at alltimes shouldn be that ******.
          Lmaol 9-3 broner you must be a dumb**** or broner fan. So what now broner whitewashed pdl too. Paulie won the first 5 rounds easily. I mean what the **** did broner do to paulie he landed 3-5 good shots after midway trough the fight yet puulie outworked him 9-3 lmaol you need to stop smoking that ****ing crack.

          I mean i know he is your favorite fighter and all but being that blind **** lol

          Comment


            Originally posted by periks19 View Post
            Lol overrating rees performance you are the one comparing let me put it straight to you so you can understand.

            You have the champion fighting a bum small guy like rees yet he looses about 3 rounds ( this was a guy that his so called defense was impenetrable like pbf) and touted as the next pbf.

            Now you have a contender who completely whitewashed a decent opponent you tell me whats more impressive. Being older means you are supposed to be better in boxing now??

            You are the one that starting to compare figthers but crawford has never looked like broner and got hit to much. Crawford doesn't have a fight where boxing analyst and people had him loosing.
            it was a stay busy fight nothing more nothing less, nobody wanted to fight him, but in your eyes rees schooled him in the first 3 rounds when in reality his damn trainer was close to stopping it in 4 lol. You just said paulie won the first 5 rounds? im done responding to you youre clearly just hating and being ignorant to the truth. Crawford has fought straight up bums, broner doesnt have the best resume but hes fought better guys bar none

            Comment


              Crawford is a bum, feed him to gamboa or Gary Russel Jr. Broner is on another level.

              Comment


                Originally posted by periks19 View Post
                Lmaol 9-3 broner you must be a dumb**** or broner fan. So what now broner whitewashed pdl too. Paulie won the first 5 rounds easily. I mean what the **** did broner do to paulie he landed 3-5 good shots after midway trough the fight yet puulie outworked him 9-3 lmaol you need to stop smoking that ****ing crack.

                I mean i know he is your favorite fighter and all but being that blind **** lol
                You're trolling. At least I hope you're trolling.cause if you're not, you should be banned from watching boxing. Good night.

                Comment


                  Originally posted by HanzGruber View Post
                  it was a stay busy fight nothing more nothing less, nobody wanted to fight him, but in your eyes rees schooled him in the first 3 rounds when in reality his damn trainer was close to stopping it in 4 lol. You just said paulie won the first 5 rounds? im done responding to you youre clearly just hating and being ignorant to the truth. Crawford has fought straight up bums, broner doesnt have the best resume but hes fought better guys bar none
                  So rees whats not a bum. And suddenly broner has fought greats?? Broner has fought nothing but bums except pdl and paulie yet they were not the the greates. We are talking about a pdl that had gotten floored by Juanma a paulie that was tko by hatto and khan.

                  Look at the fight vs paulie tell me what did broner do in the early rounds besides eat paulies jab and get outworked by him. We will see if broner skills against a true threath in maidana or be the next berto as well.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by hitking View Post
                    You're trolling. At least I hope you're trolling.cause if you're not, you should be banned from watching boxing. Good night.
                    Because i had broner winning 9-3 or 8-4 lmaol the people that even had broner winning had it 115-113 but then again you must be like the judge that scored it 117-111 for broner or like the judge that scored pbf vs canelo a draw lmaol

                    I am starting to think if you are broner himself lmaol

                    Comment


                      broner could be back at 135 he still has a belt there, but crawford looking to jump to 140 after burns

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP