Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Khan: Alexander Making Excuses, I'll Fight Him Anywhere

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #61
    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
    Guerrero is apparently a 4 division world champ. Bradley is only a 2 division champ. Guerrero is twice as "accomplished" as Bradley!
    It's arguable,I don't agree cause Guerrero started at a lower weight..He also never fought the top of the div(meaning the num 1 or 2 ranked guy)except for Floyd..I do rate Guerrero highly,he does have losses as well while Bradley is undefeated..

    I think it's arguable..

    Oh sorry I read it wrong..Your right,so is Broner..
    Last edited by Rome-By-Ko; 08-04-2013, 11:41 AM.

    Comment


      #62
      I don't know why people are on here arguing for, Alexander is not obligated to fight Khan, if Khan offers him a fight and he doesn't want to take it then Khan should move on, all these crap about deserving or no deserving is just pathetic excuses from boxing fans.

      Comment


        #63
        Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
        It's arguable,I don't agree cause Guerrero started at a lower weight..He also never fought the top of the div(meaning the num 1 or 2 ranked guy)except for Floyd..I do rate Guerrero highly,he does have losses as well while Bradley is undefeated..

        I think it's arguable..
        How come you take into account who they've fought when it's Bradley/Guerrero but you don't when it's Khan/Alexander?

        Using your logic, Guerrero is twice as accomplished as Bradley. 4 divsion >>>>>2 divisions. No argument at all.

        Comment


          #64
          Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
          How come you take into account who they've fought when it's Bradley/Guerrero but you don't when it's Khan/Alexander?

          Using your logic, Guerrero is twice as accomplished as Bradley. 4 divsion >>>>>2 divisions. No argument at all.
          Re-read the edited post again..There is no denying it..

          Comment


            #65
            Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
            Oh sorry I read it wrong..Your right,so is Broner..
            You are actually saying that Adrien Broner is more accomplished than Bradley?

            Comment


              #66
              Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
              How come you take into account who they've fought when it's Bradley/Guerrero but you don't when it's Khan/Alexander?

              Using your logic, Guerrero is twice as accomplished as Bradley. 4 divsion >>>>>2 divisions. No argument at all.
              Now can you finally admit that Alexander is more accomplished then Khan..

              Comment


                #67
                Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
                You are actually saying that Adrien Broner is more accomplished than Bradley?
                He is,does not mean he beat better fighters or that he is the better fighter..Yet in the accomplishments department,he is more accomplished then Bradley..There is no denying it..

                Comment


                  #68
                  Who is more accomplished,Mayweather or Pac??

                  Comment


                    #69
                    Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
                    He is,does not mean he beat better fighters or that he is the better fighter..Yet in the accomplishments department,he is more accomplished then Bradley..There is no denying it..


                    You're a joke. Im done here

                    Comment


                      #70
                      Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post


                      You're a joke. Im done here
                      You been done once you shown the inability to deal with facts..

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP