Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Comments Thread For: Khan: Alexander Making Excuses, I'll Fight Him Anywhere

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #51
    Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
    He might be 2-2 but he's 6-2 in his last 8. And he's fought far better opposition than any of those you mentioned, has a bigger fanbase, is better known to the public, fights on PPV or subscription, is a multi time world champion, is ranked in the top 10, sells out arenas, has just beaten Diaz who many thought beat Shawn Porter which is a better win than either Brook, Thurman, Karass and arguably maidana have managed their whole damn career. and he has been consistently winning against champions in the last 4-5 years. The fact that they are "established" wws is a bunch of bs and only haters will dig such a pathetic excuse up.
    Pssht, omg. Having a bigger fanbase and a public following has nothing to do with a fighter's skill inside the squared circle, true story. Or fighting on ppv or subscription. And no beating Diaz is not better than beating the guys Thurman and Karass beat, even recently. This is possibly one of thee most ******est posts I've ever had the horrors of reading.

    It ranks up there with when Fetta claimed Floyd would beat Marvin Hagler. Yeah, it's that bad.

    Comment


      #52
      Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
      Porter Diaz does not have a career defining win..Lopez has Ortiz,why even bring up his fight with Alvarez(which took place at JMW come on now)??Seriously??

      Those victories were special(more special then Khan coming off the deck vs Diaz)because they came against other quality WW..It should put guy's like Maidana Thurman and Karass all in a Championship hunt..I don't even know where Khan fought his last fight..I will say this tho,him moving up and getting a shot at a belt is BS bottom line..He should have to at least fight a ranked fighter at Jr WW imo..Dude has not fought a top 10 fighter in his last two fights,and is suppose to just move up and get a shot at a strap??I really don't even see what the discussion is,Khan has done nothing at the WW level while there are about 4 other fighters who are more deserving..Pretty much end of story..
      I disagree. And my point was not that Khan is more deserving, just that those guys combined best win is not equal to any of Khans top 3 wins. Plus, Khan already beat Maidana who Alexander already beat also. Why would you want a rematch between two guys who gave us a clinch fest stinker the first time?

      Nobody cares about who "deserves" what. If Alexander doesn't fight Khan he's ducking. Plain and simple.

      Comment


        #53
        Originally posted by LacedUp View Post
        I disagree. And my point was not that Khan is more deserving, just that those guys combined best win is not equal to any of Khans top 3 wins. Plus, Khan already beat Maidana who Alexander already beat also. Why would you want a rematch between two guys who gave us a clinch fest stinker the first time?

        Nobody cares about who "deserves" what. If Alexander doesn't fight Khan he's ducking. Plain and simple.
        Come on now,how many yrs ago(Maidana)was Khans best win??3 yrs ago??At least 2 since he's had a quality win??Stop it my brother..I want Maidana to fight Broner,cause Broner also has a belt..Maidana is deserving of a shot at a belt man..So is Thurman and Karass,Khan not so much..Maybe at 140lb,I'd agree with you..At WW tho not so much sorry..

        Comment


          #54
          Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
          Wow....you really are a simple **** sometimes aren't you? You think a fighter is better because he's got fewer official losses? I just listed the fighters Khan beat at 140 which ****s on what Devon did at 140 and you come back with that gay ****?
          I come back with facts,which I know you hate..Facts will always dead your dumb fuccking opinion..Sorry..

          Comment


            #55
            Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
            I come back with facts,which I know you hate..Facts will always dead your dumb fuccking opinion..Sorry..
            Just because someone has fewer official losses on their record doesn't make them a better fighter you bell end. You sound like a casual when you spout that gay ****.

            Facts? Like when you said Khan only beat 1 fighter at 140lb?

            Comment


              #56
              Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
              Just because someone has fewer official losses on their record doesn't make them a better fighter you bell end. You sound like a casual when you spout that gay ****.

              Facts? Like when you said Khan only beat 1 fighter at 140lb?
              What the hell are you talking about??When did I even say Alexander was a better fighter then Khan??Can you show this please??I did however say they are pretty even at 140lb based off accomplishments,and that Alexander is more accomplished then Khan based off of their respective careers..Anything else your talking about is utter nonsense..

              Comment


                #57
                And Alexander is a better fighter than Khan. The only thing Khan does better, is sell out an arena.

                Comment


                  #58
                  Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
                  What the hell are you talking about??When did I even say Alexander was a better fighter then Khan??Can you show this please??I did however say they are pretty even at 140lb based off accomplishments,and that Alexander is more accomplished then Khan based off of their respective careers..Anything else your talking about is utter nonsense..
                  Well I already proved they weren't even at 140 because Khan beat better fighters.

                  More accomplished? I suppose because Alexander has won 3 belts and Khan has only won 2. That's how simple and derptastic you are. Forget that the guys he's beaten for those belts were a shot Witter, bum ass Urango and an acient, one trick pony Bailey. Accomplished!

                  Comment


                    #59
                    Originally posted by Dirk Diggler UK View Post
                    Well I already proved they weren't even at 140 because Khan beat better fighters.

                    More accomplished? I suppose because Alexander has won 3 belts and Khan has only won 2. That's how simple and derptastic you are. Forget that the guys he's beaten for those belts were a shot Witter, bum ass Urango and an acient, one trick pony Bailey. Accomplished!
                    I get it facts you don't like um..Alexander is a two div Champion and a unified Champion at 140lb..Bailey would have laid Khan out btw,but let's not even go down that road right..Yes more accomplished..

                    Comment


                      #60
                      Originally posted by Rome-By-Ko View Post
                      I get it facts you don't like um..Alexander is a two div Champion and a unified Champion at 140lb..Bailey would have laid Khan out btw,but let's not even go down that road right..Yes more accomplished..
                      Guerrero is apparently a 4 division world champ. Bradley is only a 2 division champ. Guerrero is twice as "accomplished" as Bradley!

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP