Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Has anyone at the Mayweather Camp commented on Mickey Bey's doping?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    Originally posted by Dr Rumack View Post
    What the hell?

    These are the most vocal figures in the sport when it comes to doping? And now one of their own fighters is blatantly guilty of doping and they don't have jack shit to say about it.

    The hypocrisy stinks. Don't these guys have a case to answer? Bey is their fighter. He trains in their Gym. He's trained by Floyd Mayweather Sr himself. And they don't have anything to say?

    We've listened to Floyd preach about the leading role he's playing in "cleaing up the sport of boxing" for years now. Here's a quote from him from just one month ago:



    Well here's a chance for him to make a real statement, and we've heard nothing. Maybe Floyd feels that a 30:1 TE ratio doesn't make the playing field uneven.

    Some comments were made actually. David Levi of TMT mentioned that they are taking the matter quite seriously on his twitter. He said another thing too, but I can't remember the exact words. And I think Ellerbe spoke on it briefly too, that they're looking into it, etc.

    I don't think they've been asked about it really. Mickey Bey is not a popular prospect. I think it kinda went under the radar a bit. Someone like Chris Robinson should ask.

    Comment


      #42
      Originally posted by radioraheem View Post
      USADA has no employer. They have clients who they render services for. And being they are a non profit organization, they aren't so concerned about keeping Golden Boy happy just to make them happy. USADA has a lot of clients and they are quite busy. The point the other poster is making is that it's just very unlikely that an organization with such a major reputation would risk losing it over Floyd Mayweather. Lance Armstrong tried bribing and had death threats thrown at them, and yet USADA wouldn't budge.
      Well someone is signing that check for them, 100k per fight?!

      If GBP is unhappy, USADA is no longer involved in boxing. Some will say that's a better outcome since no compromise is made, some will say compromise is necessary since any testing is better that none.
      Last edited by HeroBando; 03-21-2013, 11:38 AM.

      Comment


        #43
        Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
        Well someone is signing that check for them, 100k per fight?!

        If GBP is unhappy, USADA is no longer involved in boxing. Some will say that's a better outcome since no compromise is made, some will say compromise is necessary since any testing is better that none.
        u think thats a lot of money compared to the millions of dollars they get from the us government?? stop it. they are not gonna jeopardize that over peanuts. the whole idea is ludicrous.

        Comment


          #44
          Didnt Bey go to Dr tell Dr what he did for living and Dr still gave him this that made him fail? I believe the NSAC are looking into that already. Its documented by Dr also i believe. This is reason for short suspension at moment.

          I agree with others some on this thread act like its Floyd who failed. This is a sad

          Comment


            #45
            Originally posted by DempseyRollin View Post
            u think thats a lot of money compared to the millions of dollars they get from the us government?? stop it. they are not gonna jeopardize that over peanuts. the whole idea is ludicrous.
            It's a lot of money compared to the 200k bribe (?) Armstrong attempted. A bribe is a 1 time thing, this is just for 1 fight, and is all legit.

            Comment


              #46
              Originally posted by BattlingNelson
              Quote:

              Originally Posted by HAVISJ

              I'm sure someone will comment on it but you can't blame them for a guy doping.

              But they can and should penalize him in some way. Remaining silent will make them look like hypocrits.
              since when does a promoter penalize a fighter? you guys try so hard to discredit anything this man does... so he has to hold all of his guys hands at all times.. bey and mayweather are two separate men


              Posted from krikya360.com App for Android

              Comment


                #47
                Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
                It's a lot of money compared to the 200k bribe (?) Armstrong attempted. A bribe is a 1 time thing, this is just for 1 fight, and is all legit.
                They denied the 250K "donation" from an associate and came out to media about it. You boys/girls are really reaching.

                Comment


                  #48
                  Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
                  Well someone is signing that check for them, 100k per fight?!

                  If GBP is unhappy, USADA is no longer involved in boxing. Some will say that's a better outcome since no compromise is made, some will say compromise is necessary since any testing is better that none.
                  The price tag doesn't matter so much since they are a non profit organization. That is key. The show goes on with Mayweather as a client, or without him. They were successful before entering boxing. USADA is not VADA. It is VADA where you might have a point, since they have no history before boxing, and up til now only has covered boxing. And even VADA too is a non profit, so your point would be mute with them too.

                  Comment


                    #49
                    Originally posted by radioraheem View Post
                    The price tag doesn't matter so much since they are a non profit organization. That is key. The show goes on with Mayweather as a client, or without him. They were successful before entering boxing. USADA is not VADA. It is VADA where you might have a point, since they have no history before boxing, and up til now only has covered boxing. And even VADA too is a non profit, so your point would be mute with them too.
                    Eh all those NGOs are non profits and often graft factories. There's many non profit colleges, but make no mistake, the dean and the athletic director are still getting a fat pay.

                    Anyway, all I'm saying is, the people that sign their check have opposite motivation in cycling vs boxing. And we have already seen signs of accommodation with Morales, Quillin. But we've gone over this already.

                    Comment


                      #50
                      Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
                      Eh all those NGOs are non profits and often graft factories. There's many non profit colleges, but make no mistake, the dean and the athletic director are still getting a fat pay.

                      Anyway, all I'm saying is, the people that sign their check have opposite motivation in cycling vs boxing. And we have already seen signs of accommodation with Morales, Quillin. But we've gone over this already.
                      Again, it is very unlikely that USADA would intentionally put their reputation at risk. This is an organization with an international reputation. Sure, non profits have employees who may be paid well. But the funding of the organization is not built upon the money they get from clients.

                      There is a conflict of interest when a fighter is paying for testing themselves, rather than a governing body though. With Morales, Quillin, I believe those situations were nothing more than mistakes or miscommunication. Morales in the end received a penalty. VADA too made some mistakes in the past, but they've since corrected this. They made contract adjustments and so forth. No one speaks on it though because Floyd's name isn't associated with VADA.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP