<#webadvjs#>

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Has anyone at the Mayweather Camp commented on Mickey Bey's doping?

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Originally posted by 4Corners View Post
    Some think they'd want to cover up for Mayweather, but than why would they want to bring down Lance Armstrong, who they spent years trying to bring down??? That just doesn't make sense. Lance Armstrong meant more to American sports than any boxer ever aside from maybe Muhammad Ali.
    Exactly, Lance was an icon to all cancer survivors. If anything, you would think his would've been covered up. There's always **** thrown in the game when Mayweathers name is mentioned

    Comment


      #32
      The way people are acting on this thread, you'd think that it was Floyd himself who had been tested positive. Is Floyd responsible for another fully grown man's actions???

      Unbelievable.

      Comment


        #33
        Originally posted by 4Corners View Post
        Some think they'd want to cover up for Mayweather, but than why would they want to bring down Lance Armstrong, who they spent years trying to bring down??? That just doesn't make sense. Lance Armstrong meant more to American sports than any boxer ever aside from maybe Muhammad Ali.
        Are you a Mayweather fanboy?

        Because that strawman argument has been dismantled on here countless times already, and with nearly 10,000 posts I imagine you must have seen that before.

        Whatever questions there are about Floyd failing tests don't relate to a USADA 'cover-up'. They instead focus on two issues, the possibility that Floyd (unlike these other jackasses) had his paperwork done and has an official the****utic use exemption for testosterone replacement therapy.

        The second is that the contractual relationship between USADA and their boxing clients revealed in the Morales case cast serious doubt on the transparency of the testing procedures as a whole. The master contracts that have been seen between GBP and USADA leave significant scope for the restriction of information that might be damaging. In other words, stuff that falls into that gray area like TRT.

        Comment


          #34
          Originally posted by Jedi Vader View Post
          The way people are acting on this thread, you'd think that it was Floyd himself who had been tested positive. Is Floyd responsible for another fully grown man's actions???

          Unbelievable.
          Exactly. Hes a figter not a babysitter. Bey couldve came to the ring with a syringe in his arm. Has nothing to do with Floyd.

          Comment


            #35
            Mayweathers honorable crusade on PEDS was so transparent from the beginning, never believed it.

            Comment


              #36
              why are people tripping about Floyd saying something when he hardly ever says anything? There have been a million failed test since he started doing it and he hasnt really spoke on any of them. No one said anything then but now because its someone in his camp, he has to speak out? Again, I could see if he's been going hard on all these failed test guys but he never says anything for the most part

              Comment


                #37
                Originally posted by 4Corners View Post
                Some think they'd want to cover up for Mayweather, but than why would they want to bring down Lance Armstrong, who they spent years trying to bring down??? That just doesn't make sense. Lance Armstrong meant more to American sports than any boxer ever aside from maybe Muhammad Ali.
                The obvious difference:

                USADA doesn't have a contract with Armstrong's Team USPS or whatever, but with the international cycling body. By pursuing Armstrong they were doing exactly what their employer wants them to do. Remember it took them over 10 years to nab him, partly cause the previous cycling body people were not as gung ho.

                By pursuing any boxer, they're making their employer GBP pretty unhappy and just asking to be kicked out of boxing. Remember how upset Schaefer was about Berto and Peterson, just for the fights falling through?

                Comment


                  #38
                  I asked Chris Robinson to ask Floyd Sr about that but he didn't. It's funny because he has many interviews with Floyd Sr and he asks him about pretty much anything that goes on in the sport.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    hopefully they get rid of the guy honestly don't see much in him as a fighter anyway.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      Originally posted by HeroBando View Post
                      The obvious difference:

                      USADA doesn't have a contract with Armstrong's Team USPS or whatever, but with the international cycling body. By pursuing Armstrong they were doing exactly what their employer wants them to do. Remember it took them over 10 years to nab him, partly cause the previous cycling body people were not as gung ho.

                      By pursuing any boxer, they're making their employer GBP pretty unhappy and just asking to be kicked out of boxing. Remember how upset Schaefer was about Berto and Peterson, just for the fights falling through?
                      USADA has no employer. They have clients who they render services for. And being they are a non profit organization, they aren't so concerned about keeping Golden Boy happy just to make them happy. USADA has a lot of clients and they are quite busy. The point the other poster is making is that it's just very unlikely that an organization with such a major reputation would risk losing it over Floyd Mayweather. Lance Armstrong tried bribing and had death threats thrown at them, and yet USADA wouldn't budge.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP