he had poor skills.
he only beat all those
people cuz they were old
washed up men and bums.
he had a padded record.
he would have not gone undefeated
in tysons era or the lenox lewis era.
for the last time, he might not have, not b/c he wasnt as good a fighter, but b/c he wasnt as good a HEAVYWEIGHT. p4p he is 5x better than that era. and prime tyson had it easy 2, with no legit fighters, so j/ stfu
the only people who think marciano was no good were the people who did'nt have to fight him. listen to what his opponents said about him before saying he's over-rated. just cos he did'nt skip around the ring like ali does'nt mean he could'nt box, even ali said he was better than he thought after sparring with the 45 year old rock for the computer fight.
for the last time, he might not have, not b/c he wasnt as good a fighter, but b/c he wasnt as good a HEAVYWEIGHT. p4p he is 5x better than that era. and prime tyson had it easy 2, with no legit fighters, so j/ stfu
larry holmes is a legend
to beat him is an amazing feat
learn your history dog
learn your history
he had poor skills.
he only beat all those
people cuz they were old
washed up men and bums.
he had a padded record.
he would have not gone undefeated
in tysons era or the lenox lewis era.
so in other words your even ******ed ore ignorant ore both.
Comment