Joe Cortez is a genius: Argues for putting judges higher up so they can see better.

[Foolkiller]

Judges in big fights should be in soundproof locked boxes, with HD tv's where they watch fight without commentator voices or computer graphic fight details. They should also have to verbally answer 3 questions to a computer with a lie detector test asking who they think won the round. Example: "In your professional opinion did ***** win this round? Repeat same question using other boxers name, and finally do you really believe this round was a draw. If a judge still comes up with a BS decision, throw the box away and forget about them.

[Fetta]

Who cares how cortez was as a referee. Hes retired and in the HOF. But this seems like a good idea and can maybe help limit the corruption

[Bermuda]

i like the concept, the only problem i see with it is the chair could block the view of paying fans

just have them floating suspended above the ring on wires....

[Samboxrec]

what fight was it that your man lost?

Hahahahahah too funny mate

[shade darkar]

Hatton-Mayweather

The fight where Cortez knocked Hatton into the turnbuckle.

its also the fight that you heard "break" about a million times. you never seen cortez work that hard have you!

[Light_Speed]

and if they make terrible decision they should have locking braces to lock them in place to enable the crowd to throw **** at them

"One flaw would seem to be the tall chair itself (see the accompanying diagram). It obviously would obstruct the view of some spectators. To address that problem Cortez has enlisted a manufacturer to construct the chairs with transparent acrylic."

Not a good solution since the judges aren't transparent themselves. And a lot of them are fat.

Judges in big fights should be in soundproof locked boxes, with HD tv's where they watch fight without commentator voices or computer graphic fight details. They should also have to verbally answer 3 questions to a computer with a lie detector test asking who they think won the round. Example: "In your professional opinion did ***** win this round? Repeat same question using other boxers name, and finally do you really believe this round was a draw. If a judge still comes up with a BS decision, throw the box away and forget about them.

[SpeedKillz]

its also the fight that you heard "break" about a million times. you never seen cortez work that hard have you!

/facepalm

come on guys. you really believe a different ref woulda changed the outcome? we all know it wouldn't. surely there is some kind of other scapegoat you hatton fans can use besides cortez, no?

[shade darkar]

/facepalm

come on guys. you really believe a different ref woulda changed the outcome? we all know it wouldn't. surely there is some kind of other scapegoat you hatton fans can use besides cortez, no?

where in my post does it say the result would be different?!

[Dirk Diggler UK]

where in my post does it say the result would be different?!

It doesn't. They try to completely change the argument. The fact is the guy was a terrible ref, no matter what fight he was in.

Now he's a "genius" to ******s and Floyd ****-sucks like Burner cos he stole a simple idea and passed it off as his own. An idea which does *** all to address the real issue - which is corruption.

[SpeedKillz]

where in my post does it say the result would be different?!

you right, it doesnt. just assumed thats what you meant i guess. no harm done. just used to morons, sorry...

It doesn't. They try to completely change the argument. The fact is the guy was a terrible ref, no matter what fight he was in.

Now he's a "genius" to ******s and Floyd ****-sucks like Burner cos he stole a simple idea and passed it off as his own. An idea which does *** all to address the real issue - which is corruption.

[IMG]//cdn.*****************/instances/400x/21577495.jpg[/IMG]

seriously...