so are the judges only accurate to certain fans when their fighter wins?

[-PBP-]

Most had JMM winning?

Source? You're wrong, here's my source.





That's not most, in fact that's nearly split right down the middle. Get your facts straight before you post would be my suggestion.

Dude...Skip Bayless was listed on there. LMAO:

Skip Bayless, ESPN: 116-112 Pacquiao

What does that prove? Like he's some sort of expert or something.

[Bushbaby]

Obviously!!!

[jab2theballs]

Because they're "flips"?

[Panginoon]

7,057 for Marquez 51 for Pacquiao and 36 Draw

And I am sure you can prove that 7,000 people were just Pac haters right? They are just biased people, but the "Press Row" scores aren't biased? You are too easy.
BTW
Ring has Pac at 2
Boxrec has Pac at 5

And BoxingScene, the website you're currently on, has Pac at #1. Lmao.

[ADP02]

It's simple.

- Manny vs Marquez was a close fight. There were many close rounds. If judges had it for Marquez instead of Manny, I would have disagreed but it was close enough to be OK with whichever way the judges saw it.

- Manny vs Bradley was NOT close like Manny vs Marquez. Most rounds were clearly for one guy or the other. If you add all clear rounds for Manny then do the same for Bradley then you would have it something like:

Manny - 7 clear rounds
Bradley - 1 clear round
Close rounds - 4 rounds

So even if you give all those close rounds to Bradley then it would still be 7-5 Manny.


If you don't think this way then you might as well say we are OK with how the judges judge and stop the discussion.

[D4thincarnation]

cause after manny-jmm 3 most had jmm winning.yet certain people said "judges are always right".int he very next fight this guy loses and"the judges are wrong"....so which is it?

This in not true.

[Weebler I]

yeah I didn't have Pac winning JMM III, pretty outrageous decision but more understandable than Pac-Bradley, I believe MP landed more punches than JMM. Bradley was rubbish for most of the fight.

[Larry the boss]

And BoxingScene, the website you're currently on, has Pac at #1. Lmao.

which makes it a joke..................................how can you look like ****,then lose and still be #1?

[WESS]

It is funny to see the pac-tards go from demanding everyone to watch the super duper slo mo videos, to the look at JMM's face, or look who landed more punches, to the judges know what they are talking about, to denying every bit of that logic for the Bradley fight.

Pac-tards are a funny type of fan. Simple minded and love to flip flop on the regular. Just depends on Pac's excuses post fight.

[Panginoon]

which makes it a joke..................................how can you look like ****,then lose and still be #1?

You're right, Mayweather did look pretty bad going 12 rounds with a post plaster, post Pacquiao, post prime version of Cotto.