I like how people quote boxing journalists and use Press Row scores as proof, as if they have any merit at all. They are boxing fans, just like the posters on this site...
-
-
Yes...people defend official decisions no matter how bad until their favorite fighter gets robbed.Comment
-
Sadly some fans CAN'T put their damn PRIDE ASIDE and be TRUE TO THEMSELVES, when it is robbery the uproar should be the same for ALL FIGHTERS regardless of Race, Country They Are From or Country the Robbery is in, but instead you have these fans who Scream Robbery for people they like but then defend Robberies when it happens to people they don't like, these type of fans to me are not really boxing fans, they are interested in boxing because of fighter who are either the same Race, Religious, Countryman as they are, they pick fights based on everything else BESIDES THEIR SKILLS IN THE RING because they don't know anything about their Skills in the RING...all they know is that this fighter looks like me and speaks the same language as me
then when their favorite fighter loses or struggles, they find excuses and they blame everybody else but their favorite fighter
what happened to all those Bute fans by the way hahaha
CALL IT LIKE YOU SEE IT...NOT HOW YOU WANT TO SEE IT! ROBBERY IS ROBBERY Regardless of which country it is in!Last edited by sicko; 07-07-2012, 02:00 PM.Comment
-
EXACTLY!Originally posted by CHOWWOKKA View Post
Score the fight yourself, have your own opinion, that is the PROBLEM when you have Biased Announcers feeding Casual Fans Lies and BS and trying to DECEIT mostly the Casual fans who have no ***in clue how Scoring in Boxing Works
so yeah they are going to say "WELL HAROLD LEDERMAN HAD HIM WINNING"
HBO has a ***in AGENDA, they don't won't to see their Top Fighters Lose, especially the ones who Generate A Lot Of Money For The Network (INCLUDING MAYWEATHER EVEN THOUGH THEY PRETEND TO HATE HIM DURING THE BROADCAST)Comment
-
Most had JMM winning?
Source? You're wrong, here's my source.
That's not most, in fact that's nearly split right down the middle. Get your facts straight before you post would be my suggestion.None of the above scores for Marquez or a draw is from Mexican media/boxers.
None of the above scores for Pacquiao or a draw is from Philippine media/boxers.
Among the unofficial scorers above, 57 scored the bout for Marquez, 51 scored the bout for Pacquiao, and the remaining 36 scored the bout a draw.Comment
-
It was voted biggest robbery of 2011 on Ring Magazine. That means more people thought Marquez won then Pacquiao.............Originally posted by Panginoon View Post
....
/.
Comment
-
It only had around 7,000 votes total by disgruntled JMM fans and Pacquiao haters. It was also the biggest boxing event of 2011. Ring Magazine still has Pac #1.Originally posted by CHOWWOKKA View PostIt was voted biggest robbery of 2011 on Ring Magazine. That means more people thought Marquez won then Pacquiao.............
....
/.
Comment
-
Dude...box rec has hundreds of editors. Some of the notations on fights are hilarious. Using it as a reference for anything other than records and scores is idiotic.Originally posted by Panginoon View Post
Comment
-
As opposed to using HBO poll votes and other various polls on boxing forums? LMAO.Originally posted by DeadLikeMe View PostDude...box rec has hundreds of editors. Some of the notations on fights are hilarious. Using it as a reference for anything other than records and scores is idiotic.
Comment
-
7,057 for Marquez 51 for Pacquiao and 36 DrawOriginally posted by Panginoon View PostIt only had around 7,000 votes total by disgruntled JMM fans and Pacquiao haters. It was also the biggest boxing event of 2011. Ring Magazine still has Pac #1.
And I am sure you can prove that 7,000 people were just Pac haters right? They are just biased people, but the "Press Row" scores aren't biased? You are too easy.
BTW
Ring has Pac at 2
Boxrec has Pac at 5
Comment
Comment