Originally posted by Boxing Goat
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Does a prime George Foreman KO a prime Vitali Klitschko?
Collapse
-
-
-
-
Originally posted by poet682006 View PostMore like it's the objective opinion of damn near every respected boxing expert out there.
Sorry, but people who actually know boxing don't evaluate talent in a division based on the number white Europeans in the rankings like you and your ilk do.
According to your logic the less white ppl there are in the HW division the better the division is, so the modern HW sucks, cause best fighters these days happen to be white, however, in your little mind a white guy can't be better then a black guy lol
Hmm.. That's a very credible and objective opinion. Probably based on the movie naked gun where he says:"All I know is never bet on the white guy".
We need more boxing experts like you lol
Comment
-
Originally posted by Weltschmerz View Postlol.
I have none of that. I support the Klitschko's because they are great champions, simply.
The haters have a lot of hating still to do
Comment
-
Originally posted by A_Jeffrey View Postso it looks like your boxing "expertise" is based on race of a fighter.
According to your logic the less white ppl there are in the HW division the better the division is, so the modern HW sucks, cause best fighters these days happen to be white, however, in your little mind a white guy can't be better then a black guy lol
Hmm.. That's a very credible and objective opinion. Probably based on the movie naked gun where he says:"All I know is never bet on the white guy".
We need more boxing experts like you lol
Now, my estimation of their talents has nothing to do with their skin color because if you had bothered to poke your fool head into the Deontay Wilder thread you have seen me post that I wasn't impressed with him either. I'm not impressed with any of today's Heavies. Black, white, Euro, American, doesn't matter: They all stink.
See that's the thing: Whereas someone of your ilk wouldn't have anything to do with the Klits if they were black American fighters, I would still see them as non-ATGs dominating a crap division. Their ethnicity and nationality wouldn't matter one damn bit. But it sure would to you.Last edited by StarshipTrooper; 10-28-2013, 10:11 PM.
Comment
-
It's funny to me how old timers like to hark on "skills" over "athleticism" as a go to for why older fighters would win, but completely suspend this belief when it comes to a young George Foreman. Foreman was garbage. He had an embarrassing skill set. His success in the 70s was based on overwhelming smaller men with physicality. Vitali would land right hands on Foreman at will and mop the floor with him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Cardinal Buck View PostIt's funny to me how old timers like to hark on "skills" over "athleticism" as a go to for why older fighters would win, but completely suspend this belief when it comes to a young George Foreman. Foreman was garbage. He had an embarrassing skill set. His success in the 70s was based on overwhelming smaller men with physicality. Vitali would land right hands on Foreman at will and mop the floor with him.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GeneralZod View PostA guy who went 40-0 with almost all Knockouts with wins over Joe Frazier, Kenny Norton, and Ron Lyle and actually beat a universal heavyweight champion that put down Muhammad Ali was garbage? Ok then.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GeneralZod View PostVitali's a great champion? He hasn't fought in two years and likely is dropping the belt for his political run. Wlad's never beaten a no. 1 contender because it's always been Vitali. Pretty big problem going on there.
Comment
Comment