Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The pfp #1 spot.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Originally posted by Boxing Bob View Post
    Pac-boy, did you really just make the arguement that Ward shoudln't be rated above Pac in the P4P ratings because he's not in the same weight class. Rethink that statement in your mind. Think P4P. And you're insisting Floyd was the cause of the fight breaking down when every person involved in the sport says it was Arum (Pacs promoter)
    nobody said nothing about P4P ratings. Bushbaby said last two years...Maybe you should rethink what you wanna say before you say it..Other words ...get the facts straight.
    I know the same weight class dont mean nothing in the P4P rankings. But if you are basing performance due to opposition ...well than each weight class has different opposition in it. You cant do a whole lot in two fights. Unless you are fighting 4 times a year or more with top ten opposition! Read the threads before you get trigger happy.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by Bushbaby View Post
      Listen kid........Wards resume in the last 2 years absolutely bosses on Floyds as well, he's my #1. Anything else you'd like to ask?
      hes your #1 P4P because of two fights....lol hehehee ! Everyone has a hero...Dont try getting a job at Ring ****zine...boy! lol[IMG]//i1132.***********.com/albums/m575/maxmoo/Funny%20Pics/Decor%20Smileys/ththSmily-LMAO-Oops.gif[/IMG]
      Last edited by PAC-BOY; 02-25-2012, 02:14 PM.

      Comment


        #23
        Pac-nerd, so you're saying Wards 3 years worth of fighting top level opposition shouldn't place him above Pac's longevity, in the same breathe you claim Floyds 16 year undefeated reign shouldn't place him above Pac either?


        When Bush Baby stated that Wards resume over the last few years bosses Pacs you stated "that would mean something if they were in the same weight class". When I posted the lunacy of that argument, you got butt hurt and claimed you meant something else. What?

        Comment


          #24
          I would put andre ward or Marquez at 1-2 Mayweather at 3 and Pacquiao at 4

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by PAC-BOY View Post
            nobody said nothing about P4P ratings. Bushbaby said last two years...Maybe you should rethink what you wanna say before you say it..Other words ...get the facts straight.
            I know the same weight class dont mean nothing in the P4P rankings. But if you are basing performance due to opposition ...well than each weight class has different opposition in it. You cant do a whole lot in two fights. Unless you are fighting 4 times a year or more with top ten opposition! Read the threads before you get trigger happy.
            Check the thread title.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by CHOWWOKKA View Post
              Check the thread title.

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by CHOWWOKKA View Post
                I would put andre ward or Marquez at 1-2 Mayweather at 3 and Pacquiao at 4
                Ward is my number1, Floyd, Marquez, then toss up between PAC and Martinez

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by Bushbaby View Post
                  Originally posted by CHOWWOKKA View Post
                  Check the thread title.
                  Originally posted by Bushbaby View Post
                  Andre Wards last 2 years puts Pacman's to shame.
                  lol like getting off topic as b!tchbaby did never happens. The thread tiltle means nothing to what bush baby said which was as quote wrapped above. Thats where the conversation began. Not as tilted in the thread beginning. LOL just owned two at a time ..lol gotta love that! heheheeeeee
                  :Aui:
                  [IMG]//i380.***********.com/albums/oo243/GreenEyedMtnGal/Smileys/freewebjunk_dot_com_funny_71.gif[/IMG]
                  Last edited by PAC-BOY; 02-25-2012, 03:56 PM.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    I don't see how Pacquiao can be No1, considering he lost.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Floyd has to be at that top spot IMO. I love Pac, but his recent track record has looked pretty bad, and he needed to smash Marquez to keep that spot for me. Floyd is looking so far above everyone else at the moment, that any argument ended for me.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP