Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

IF Cotto beats Floyd, will Floyd be exposed??

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21
    Anyone who thinks Floyd is a fraud is an ignorant stan with an agenda. Or they're just Skip Bayless (the ULTIMATE stan with the agenda). Period.

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by Bombs View Post
      Since this is the first real WW he has faced and he's been accused to ducking the top WWs in their prime... now that the is fighting one who many claim isn't in his prime. If he loses..

      Would that exposed Floyd as the fraud many think he is??

      Even though it's a long shot because Cotto got destroyed by Pac and isn't the same since, but if he manages to still beat Floyd I think that would be it and floyd would be exposed.
      Certain dreams and prayers just don't come true. Don't you just hate that. LMAO

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by Bombs View Post
        Since this is the first real WW he has faced and he's been accused to ducking the top WWs in their prime... now that the is fighting one who many claim isn't in his prime. If he loses..

        Would that exposed Floyd as the fraud many think he is??

        Even though it's a long shot because Cotto got destroyed by Pac and isn't the same since, but if he manages to still beat Floyd I think that would be it and floyd would be exposed.
        Mayweather isn't exactly a fraud. He's avery good fighter, and was noted by Larry merchant early in is career. he just wasn't popular with boxing fans and always proverbially "stunk out the house, even a quarter filled arena, which most of his fights were. Suddenly after fighting oscar this all changed, although he had been beginning to arouse some fan support. before this. He's still the same fighter, same style etc, so don'n really know what changed, other than the less knowledgeable quality of the fans and the arrvial of the "cults"

        It doesn't matter to me anyway.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by ИATAS206 View Post
          never understood that term "exposed" when used for pro's in their 30's like pac & floyd and have proven their talents over and over again throughout their careers.

          exposed is usually a saying for hyped up prospects or protected fighters who are taught a boxing lesson or chin checked by a vet or whatever.
          Agreed.............

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by 4CornersKid View Post
            Hahahahahahahahahaha you bash Floyd's pick of Cotto, saying he's not what he once was, but just a couple weeks ago you were saying "Pac-Cotto II at 147, shoudl be a great fight".
            TS exposed

            Comment


              #26
              Yes, Floyd would be exposed big time. Margarito exposed Cotto, as did Pac. So if Cotto beats Floyd, Floyd would be exposed, as he couldnt expose Cotto like Pac did.

              Comment


                #27
                Floyd is no fraud, he is one of if not the greatest talents of the era and among the best ive watched in real time.

                If Cotto beats him it will be all to Cotto's credit and not because Mayweather was overrated

                Comment


                  #28
                  Even from way back Floyd was always a a hugely talented.

                  There is nothing to expose.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    how does it take nearly 20 years to expose a guy?? lol.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      No. Depending on how he loses of course but I think it'll rather be a way to say he is officially past his prime. It is going to happen eventually.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP