Originally posted by hillbilly
View Post
Here's the deal: Floyd is not the most skillful fighter of this generation, unless you define "generation" in a very narrow way. On All-Time Great lists many fighters that fought during the same years as Floyd are more highly regarded than he is. For example, his career overlapped with Roberto Duran--a top 10 all-time fighter. Floyd will never, ever be as highly regarded as Duran. Never. And he shouldn't. Duran was a way better fighter. If Mayweather refuses to meet Pacquiao in the ring and defeat him, Pacquiao will most certainly be ranked higher than him as well. Julio Cesar Chavez is above him, Roy Jones, Jr., Erik Morales . . . there are quite a few.
Let's leave the hyperbole alone. I think Mayweather will win this fight by decision but to compare Ortiz to Gatti and Baldomir? Really? That is not objective analysis by any standard. I love Gatti but Gatti was an incredibly flawed fighter. You need look no further than his fights with Ward for evidence of this. Ortiz is a much better boxer than him. To also throw Marquez and Hatton in there is a joke. Hatton had had one fight at welterweight, was out on his feet and generally got his ass kicked by Collazo (but got a bunk decision). Afterwards, he promised to never fight at welter again (then Floyd offered him money and he said yes). Marquez was coming up in weight 12 lbs for the fight after having come up 9 within the past year. Wow.
Of the people that you could say had the mantle of good to great fighter on their shoulders in their careers that Mayweather fought, only one was in his prime when Mayweather fought him: Zab Judah. And Judah looked damn good against Mayweather early in the fight even scoring a flash knockdown. De La Hoya was well past his prime and still got a split decision. It is not hard to believe that De La Hoya, in his prime (a la his fights with Mosley or Tito) would have won this fight. Mosley was a shot fighter. does anybody doubt this? Watch his fight against Mayorga BEFORE he fought Mayweather. Sure he scored a 12th round knockout, but the first 11 rounds Mosley looked like crap against Mayorga--a fighter that hasn't even looked decent for at least 5 years. Everybody was saying after Mayorga that Mosley should retire.
Objectively, one cannot definitively say that Mayweather is better than Pacquiao. Mayweather has fought a decisively lower caliber of competition at 147. Does he have a single win against a HOF fighter in his prime? If you stretch and say De La Hoya, ok. But that is a stretch. Pacquiao has many. Barrera twice, Morales twice, Marquez, Cotto. That Mayweather has yet to fight let alone beat a HOF caliber fighter at his peak speaks volumes about Mayweather's right to call himself an all-time great.
Let's leave the hyperbole alone. I think Mayweather will win this fight by decision but to compare Ortiz to Gatti and Baldomir? Really? That is not objective analysis by any standard. I love Gatti but Gatti was an incredibly flawed fighter. You need look no further than his fights with Ward for evidence of this. Ortiz is a much better boxer than him. To also throw Marquez and Hatton in there is a joke. Hatton had had one fight at welterweight, was out on his feet and generally got his ass kicked by Collazo (but got a bunk decision). Afterwards, he promised to never fight at welter again (then Floyd offered him money and he said yes). Marquez was coming up in weight 12 lbs for the fight after having come up 9 within the past year. Wow.
Of the people that you could say had the mantle of good to great fighter on their shoulders in their careers that Mayweather fought, only one was in his prime when Mayweather fought him: Zab Judah. And Judah looked damn good against Mayweather early in the fight even scoring a flash knockdown. De La Hoya was well past his prime and still got a split decision. It is not hard to believe that De La Hoya, in his prime (a la his fights with Mosley or Tito) would have won this fight. Mosley was a shot fighter. does anybody doubt this? Watch his fight against Mayorga BEFORE he fought Mayweather. Sure he scored a 12th round knockout, but the first 11 rounds Mosley looked like crap against Mayorga--a fighter that hasn't even looked decent for at least 5 years. Everybody was saying after Mayorga that Mosley should retire.
Objectively, one cannot definitively say that Mayweather is better than Pacquiao. Mayweather has fought a decisively lower caliber of competition at 147. Does he have a single win against a HOF fighter in his prime? If you stretch and say De La Hoya, ok. But that is a stretch. Pacquiao has many. Barrera twice, Morales twice, Marquez, Cotto. That Mayweather has yet to fight let alone beat a HOF caliber fighter at his peak speaks volumes about Mayweather's right to call himself an all-time great.
Comment