Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Vitaliy is a Legend

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Originally posted by N P
    The ref ruled them such, yes, but they were not legit because they resulted from the serial rabbit punching.

    Several respected commentators and writers have noted this. Their opinion is worth more than yours. Your opinion is worth ****.

    The knock downs were a direct result of Wlad being hurt with no legs under him.

    Do you deny this?

    The ref called the knock downs, and he had a better vantage point than you to make the call as to weather or not Wlad was turning away from punches coming.

    His opinion, like 98% of peopele's, is more meaningful than yours.

    Besides, the 2nd KD in the 5th saw Wlad at Peter's arm pit level which was about 5'7. It's his fault he was down there, and it's because he was hurt with no legs under him.

    Perhaps you should make a few new threads about it?

    Comment


      Originally posted by BadMagick
      I find his comment funny, because he couldn't even hurt an old, out of shape Lewis, how could he hurt a prime Lewis, let alone KO him? McCall got a lucky punch.
      Mc'Calls punch wasn't near as lucky as the punch Lewises landed to cut Vitali. If you could call that a punch, I call it a sc**** from the side.

      Was Rahmans punch lucky as well?

      Comment


        Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
        The knock downs were a direct result of Wlad being hurt with no legs under him.

        Do you deny this?

        The ref called the knock downs, and he had a better vantage point than you to make the call as to weather or not Wlad was turning away from punches coming.

        His opinion, like 98% of peopele's, is more meaningful than yours.

        Besides, the 2nd KD in the 5th saw Wlad at Peter's arm pit level which was about 5'7. It's his fault he was down there, and it's because he was hurt with no legs under him.

        Perhaps you should make a few new threads about it?
        Sure whatever you say bud,

        Comment


          Originally posted by Enayze
          Calling top ten fighters in Larry Donald (At the time), Vaughn Bean (at the time), Corrie Sanders, Kirk Johnson, and Danny Williams, mediocre is ignorant as you. Plus every fighter listed has a superb chin, along with Ross Purity, so knocking them out, has to count for something when talking about knockout %, but like I said I wouldn't expect people with half a brain, such as yourself to understand that.

          So calling Larry Donald, Vaughn Bean, Corrie Sanders, Kirk Johnson, and Danny Williams mediocre opponents is NOT accurate?


          Keep talking.

          You're only making it easier.

          Comment


            Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
            Again, what does this prove?

            Does this change the fact he lost to the two best fighters he ever faced and has his top wins over Corrie Sanders, Kirk Johnson, and Larry Donald?

            Does it change the fact he's fought 3 times since losing to Lewis and is now 34, one of 4 title holders in one of the weakest points in the divison's history?

            Does this change the fact that for some reason you felt the need to start a new account because you were ashamed of your old name Nautalis?
            What does this prove? This proves that your idiotic ass is wrong, in claiming Vitali's KO's came only because he versed mediocre competition.

            Comment


              Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
              So calling Larry Donald, Vaughn Bean, Corrie Sanders, Kirk Johnson, and Danny Williams mediocre opponents is NOT accurate?


              Keep talking.

              You're only making it easier.

              Mediocre or not they were top ten.

              Comment


                Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
                Again, what does this prove?

                Does this change the fact he lost to the two best fighters he ever faced and has his top wins over Corrie Sanders, Kirk Johnson, and Larry Donald?

                Does it change the fact he's fought 3 times since losing to Lewis and is now 34, one of 4 title holders in one of the weakest points in the divison's history?

                Does this change the fact that for some reason you felt the need to start a new account because you were ashamed of your old name Nautalis?
                Don't ***ing distract the discussion:

                Could you name 5 fighters who had the 97% KO percentage over a less mediocre set of opponents in 30+ fights, besides Foreman?

                Comment


                  Originally posted by Enayze
                  Mediocre or not they were top ten.

                  So the HIGH point of Vitali's career is that he's beat 6 mediocre top ten fighters.

                  Bravo.

                  Comment


                    Originally posted by Bozo_no_no
                    So the HIGH point of Vitali's career is that he's beat 6 mediocre top ten fighters.

                    Bravo.
                    The high point is that he went toe to toe with Lewis.

                    The high point is that he is 4 time pro kickboxing champion and 2 times world boxing champ.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by N P
                      The high point is that he went toe to toe with Lewis.

                      That was similar to Chuck Wepner's career high point.



                      Originally posted by N P
                      The high point is that he is 4 time pro kickboxing champion and 2 times world boxing champ.


                      The Kick boxing part has as much to do with boxing as the topic you started with this thread.

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP