Gerorge Foreman: Wlad won't leave much of a legacy in boxing

[D4thincarnation]

You can become a smarter fighter, but you aren't going to become physically better. It takes a combination of the two to make a great fighter, but that doesn't mean he wasn't prime for the fights mentioned.

Exactly right, the only differece in Wlad from now to the Sanders days is tactical.

He has become an ultra defensive jabber and will keep his right by his chin for 99% of the fight.

[JAB5239]

An absolute lie.

Why than in every sport to athletes start to physically decline after the age of 30. There are literally THOUSANDS of examples yet you want us to believe Wlad is the magic exception.

Pull your head out of the sand, the facts can't be argued with. If they can than you will be happy to show me this incredible list of athletes who actually improved and got stronger and faster after 30. Im waiting.

[Mr. Invincible]

You are obviously on Dope comparing a loss from Ali to the Klitchko's getting whooped by scrubs you need to stop because you obviously don't know **** about boxing and it's making you look dumb!!!!!

If you didn't get the point, which I'm sure you didn't........it was that any fighter can lost at one point or another in their primes and that doesn't necessarily mean that said fighter is/was better than them. Are the two men that sparked Lennox better than him? Was Douglas better than Tyson? Was Schmelling better than Joe Louis? No......exactly.

This is my point and by not understanding this actually shows your true level of intelligence.

[Mr. Invincible]

Lmao, I love the lies you spew. Are you talking about the little back and forth we had after I wouldn't let you troll the history section?

What do I gain from lying on the internet?

[Vadrigar.]

You can become a smarter fighter, but you aren't going to become physically better. It takes a combination of the two to make a great fighter, but that doesn't mean he wasn't prime for the fights mentioned.

Unless he is implicitly stating that Wlad was on the juice. Then it would be possible

[Mr. Invincible]

Wasn't that was when this nut case called Tommy Morrison a white Joe Frazier?

Bury you? this guy already buried himself.

He essentially was. I stand by this. Except I think Morrison was a better figher overall. He in fact did beat Foreman, even if it was an older version. It was for a world title, however.

[Mr. Invincible]

You can become a smarter fighter, but you aren't going to become physically better. It takes a combination of the two to make a great fighter, but that doesn't mean he wasn't prime for the fights mentioned.

Oh nvm. It's like talking to a brick wall. You lack the ilk to understand what I'm saying.

[JAB5239]

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!

Your mind controls your physical body man. When you get older , you get wiser and react in a better way, making you physically better. Did you seriously just write that? The key is to keep the body as sharp as it was like in your physical prime.(28-35,imo) Obviously this is not a Klitschko problem. Wlad now is the best he's ever been. He will not lose any time soon and when he hangs em up at like 37-38, he will have won 20+ title fights and will likely be considered top ten all time. If you don't like that, fine. But there's no use in trying to convince others not to like it too.

Ok so lets take a sport that depends more on the physical rather than mental. Why are all the fastest times in history, in the 100 meter dash recorded by men in their mid twenties? If you assessment was correct than guys in their mid 30's should be just as competitive. Why aren't they?

[ChopperRead]

Oh nvm. It's like talking to a brick wall. You lack the ilk to understand what I'm saying.

I just wrote to Rick Reeno via Facebook about this guy. We'll see what he has to say about it.

My advice is to save your breath because you make great points but you're talking to someone with an agenda who isn't interested in them.

[JAB5239]

You're not fooling anyone with your protestations of objectivity. Anyone who claims "prime Wlad" lost to Sanders and Brewster doesn't need to say anything else on the K-Bros. You gave away the game already and that's why you're furious and name-calling.

You seem to have a good deal of what appears to be a fragile ego bound up with your posts on this site. So when people take you on, you get extremely defensive, boastful, and apparently become downright stalker-ish in your behavior.

You should be removed as a moderator here forthwith.

So you still have no answers?