Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Jean Pascal has lost every single fight where he stepped up in competition.

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #21


    He lost to Froch, so what? Isn't Froch a top fighter in his prime?

    Comment


      #22
      Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
      Once again the TS proves that he's a Nationalistic idiot.
      Does Jean Pascal has some kind of hidden victory we are missing? His display vs. Dawson was intriguing, but the way he gassed combined with an opportune headbutt (which had it been delivered by an American, we know the claims that would have been made) makes that win less than glorious in my book. I don't you don't give him credit for the Diaconu wins, so what has Pascal done that is so special?

      Comment


        #23
        Originally posted by TheTruth! View Post


        He lost to Froch, so what? Isn't Froch a top fighter in his prime?
        What don't you understand about the thread? The point is the guy is not world class and can't beat a top guy in the division. Yeah, he built rounds up against Dawson and was awarded victory but that was fluke victory due to Dawsons rust and a cut allowing the fight to end and Pascal escape. He lost both fights to Hopkins and lost to Froch and all these fights were on his soil. Jean Pascal is not a world class fighter and can never beat the guys that actually matter in this division. Cloud and Cleverly would probably stop him as well.

        Comment


          #24
          Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
          Once again the TS proves that he's a Nationalistic idiot.
          Yeah, yet you have nothing that could dispute what I am saying. Pascal is not good.

          Comment


            #25
            Originally posted by TheTruth! View Post


            He lost to Froch, so what? Isn't Froch a top fighter in his prime?
            LOL at Hitler. We are America. We are white, we are black, we are brown, we are Asian, we are gay, we are tran***ual, we literally are home to anything and everything you can imagine.

            Hitler? You're try to play the wrong men Maestro.

            Comment


              #26
              Originally posted by Uncle Sam View Post
              Does Jean Pascal has some kind of hidden victory we are missing? His display vs. Dawson was intriguing, but the way he gassed combined with an opportune headbutt (which had it been delivered by an American, we know the claims that would have been made) makes that win less than glorious in my book. I don't you don't give him credit for the Diaconu wins, so what has Pascal done that is so special?
              Why won't I give him credit for the Diaconu win? And, once again he beat Dawson. He won, who besides Pascal has done that to Dawson? Who exactly?

              To call Pascal a bum? A bum? Do you guys know what bum is? Jamie Ambler, that's a bum. A bum couldn't drop B-hop once let alone TWICE.

              Dawson is a very skilled fighter. Pascal stepped up in competition against Dawson. And, won. Everybody can sit here and make all the excuses he wants but Pascal won. Stop with the BS.

              Comment


                #27
                Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
                Why won't I give him credit for the Diaconu win? And, once again he beat Dawson. He won, who besides Pascal has done that to Dawson? Who exactly?

                To call Pascal a bum? A bum? Do you guys know what bum is? Jamie Ambler, that's a bum. A bum couldn't drop B-hop once let alone TWICE.

                Dawson is a very skilled fighter. Pascal stepped up in competition against Dawson. And, won. Everybody can sit here and make all the excuses he wants but Pascal won. Stop with the BS.
                I'm sorry, I was not trying to argue that man was a legitimate bum, just that he wasn't some kind of ruler of the throne at 175.

                Comment


                  #28
                  Originally posted by Check View Post
                  Yeah, yet you have nothing that could dispute what I am saying. Pascal is not good.
                  Of course I can. Believe me if the topic is straight boxing related. I would debate circles around you But, I won't debate a Nationalistic moron like you. Just like I won't debate Nationalistic idiots from Canada, Mexico, Puerto Rico, England, Russia, Ukraine, Germany or any Nationalistic idiot.

                  Comment


                    #29
                    Pascal just can't be that good because for 8 rounds of the fight he isn't very active, and you can't afford that on the top level. The dude needs to do something about his stamina. Stamina is what cost him the Froch fight as well. It was very even until Froch pulled away after the 5th.

                    Comment


                      #30
                      Originally posted by Uncle Sam View Post
                      I'm sorry, I was not trying to argue that man was a legitimate bum, just that he wasn't some kind of ruler of the throne at 175.
                      Well he was the ring/lineal champ. So he was the man at the division before B-hop beat him. How was he not?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP