Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

what do people mean when they say pac weight drain

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #51
    Originally posted by master_rose View Post
    if 1 or 2 lbs doesn't make a difference, then why did they ask for it!?

    Use your head!
    if 1 or 2 lbs matterd, why did cotto agree?........use you head...

    Comment


      #52
      Originally posted by boxingking500 View Post
      catchweights have always been accepted.. there has ever been any controversy with them.. until pacquiao started using them

      hypocrisy at its finet
      when a fight contract is signed/agreed and sanctioned by the governing body, then all is settled; including any weight issues.....why such questions arise is beyond me

      Comment


        #53
        *nuke a *******!*

        Comment


          #54
          Originally posted by jrosales13 View Post
          What's better is fighting the best available. Weather it is moving up, moving down, staying at your weight. Fight the best available...

          Because, having JMM move up(which is what you implying to knock Floyd) is as equal as fighting garbage ass fights against Margarito and Mosley.

          Neither one is better or worse. All 3 are equally as garbage.

          You fight the best available period.
          Back in time when he fought only once at 135 let alone at 140 or 147. SMH at *****s saying when Pac fought for the first time at 147 after jumped 2 weight divisions above and they said it was Oscar disadvantage? OMG! Hopefully we can turn back the clock and make Pac fights Oscar at 154 or the best at 160 for Oscar to have an even field and not weight drained as oppose to his fight at 147.
          Last edited by straightleft; 04-02-2011, 03:43 AM.

          Comment


            #55
            Originally posted by puga View Post
            if 1 or 2 lbs matterd, why did cotto agree?........use you head...
            Your little pee brain won't understand words, so I'll use a picture and hopefully you'll get it.


            Comment


              #56
              Originally posted by [KLTP] View Post
              Your little pee brain won't understand words, so I'll use a picture and hopefully you'll get it.


              and this means he was weightdrained?....

              Comment


                #57
                Originally posted by Reloaded View Post
                Athletes grow , Margo was a WW and then he had 2 yrs off blew up and fought at 154 ,, he aint no WW any more and he was weight drained at 150 .
                Marg was paid handsomely as well, he even said he got beat by the best fighter in the world as did Cotto.

                Comment


                  #58
                  Originally posted by puga View Post
                  and this means he was weightdrained?....
                  Its the reason Cotto agreed to be drained , same reason Pac takes PEDS its about money , they are prize fighters , Clottey Margo Mosley combined were worth more to Pac than not taking PEDS and loosing to Floyd in early 2010 , because all he has to do is now is agree to the test and if Floyd beats him it dont matter Pac because Pac milked the system all the way .

                  Little scammer Pac is .

                  Comment


                    #59
                    Originally posted by Reloaded View Post
                    Its the reason Cotto agreed to be drained , same reason Pac takes PEDS its about money , they are prize fighters , Clottey Margo Mosley combined were worth more to Pac than not taking PEDS and loosing to Floyd in early 2010 , because all he has to do is now is agree to the test and if Floyd beats him it dont matter Pac because Pac milked the system all the way .

                    Little scammer Pac is .
                    only stup1dasses think cotto was drained....and pac being on ped's is a su****ion started by the no class, no priciple family of human ****, the maywethars..but floyd on xylocaine is a fact...and he's labelled a b1tch ....lol
                    Last edited by puga; 04-02-2011, 03:19 AM.

                    Comment


                      #60
                      Originally posted by boxingking500 View Post
                      well last time i checked

                      the cotto catchweight 145lb i believe was only like a 1 pound difference in which cotto usually comes in at.. so i doubt 1,2 pounds make a difference

                      margarito came in at 150, pac came in like 144.. and to really think margarito would of won if it was at the full limit 154.. pac demolished him...

                      why are catchweights considered "bad" now since pac has been using them, when they have been perfectly acceptable in the sport of boxing for many years.. hypocrites i tell you
                      Well Cotto went up to 154 to compete after that loss so..

                      Would it help Margarito coming in at 154? probably not but why even ask for the CW in the first place?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP