Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Should fighters even waste their time fighting hopkins

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #91
    Originally posted by Sweet Jesus View Post
    There's already a bunch of people that can say that. And they can say that they didn't have to fight a 50 year old man to do it.
    amen your right!

    Comment


      #92
      Originally posted by Sweet Jesus View Post
      There's already a bunch of people that can say that. And they can say that they didn't have to fight a 50 year old man to do it.
      Alright I'll give you thy next thing i can think of is he's annoying or just a good name to beat

      Comment


        #93
        Originally posted by ИATAS206 View Post
        Why don't you ask the guys that want to fight him Pascal, Dawson and Cloud all want to fight him, shi!t I bet Froch would even want to fight him after the super six. I bet you $100 none of these guys give a flying fuck what people on the internet think



        the rocky excuse is the lamest excuse in all of boxing, almost as bad as his initial excuse of being poisoned. The giant milk dud lost because hopkins is better, plain and simple.
        Yeah but what I'm saying is he isnt a quality win you just called him a milk dud why because he sucks he never beat anyone he just had roys card I'm just
        Going for the fact that Roy had better wins. Do you agree?

        Comment


          #94
          Originally posted by MRBOOMER View Post
          Yeah but what I'm saying is he isnt a quality win you just called him a milk dud why because he sucks he never beat anyone he just had roys card I'm just
          I called him a milk dudd because he litterally looks like a milk dud. He was the man at light heavyweight, the lineal champ and hops dominating win over him shouldn't be discredited.

          Comment


            #95
            How's the whole rep power thing work?

            Comment


              #96
              Originally posted by ИATAS206 View Post
              I called him a milk dudd because he litterally looks like a milk dud. He was the man at light heavyweight, the lineal champ and hops dominating win over him shouldn't be discredited.

              Okay okay but who'd tarver beat and yea know Roy i know glen Johnson yep and Clinton woods-_- okay who else? Montell griffin? Ehh not buying it he just seems so paper and honestly tell me did tarver look the same when he fought Hopkins he just looked burned out like he didn't care and if so why would Hopkins just decide to jump up fight him after the weight loss could it be a thought that maybe he'd be slouchy and just fatagiued the whole fight? I've lost weight like that I'n short times it just makes you feel like crap plus tarver said he had trouble making 175 so...?

              Comment


                #97
                Originally posted by ИATAS206 View Post
                I called him a milk dudd because he litterally looks like a milk dud. He was the man at light heavyweight, the lineal champ and hops dominating win over him shouldn't be discredited.

                I gotta say that milk dud is funny as hell tho lmao where'd you find that

                Comment


                  #98
                  Originally posted by ИATAS206 View Post
                  Why don't you ask the guys that want to fight him Pascal, Dawson and Cloud all want to fight him, shi!t I bet Froch would even want to fight him after the super six. I bet you $100 none of these guys give a flying fuck what people on the internet think
                  The people on the internet are just as dumb as those boxers. Everyone online writes off Hopkins before every fight as well. That's why they fight him, easy victory over an active, top-ranked legend that is at the end of his career.

                  Bye bye Pavlik's career.
                  In a couple months, bye bye Pascal's career.
                  Dawson whoops him, but Hopkins would ruin Cloud's career as well.

                  Comment


                    #99
                    Originally posted by MRBOOMER View Post
                    Okay okay but who'd tarver beat and yea know Roy i know glen Johnson yep and Clinton woods-_- okay who else? Montell griffin?
                    The who's who of 175. Not sure who else he could have beat. he beat all the names. Jones, Glen Johnson, Woods, Griffin and all of the solid lower level guys. Again, he was the man at 175 when Hopkins beat him.


                    Ehh not buying it he just seems so paper
                    Paper? lol paper is Andre Berto. Paper is not when you KTFO the reigning champ and defend the titles

                    and honestly tell me did tarver look the same when he fought Hopkins
                    No one looks the same against Hopkins. No one. Pavlik, Trinidad, Glen Johnson, Taylor, Calzaghe, Winky, Pascal, it's no coincidence that everyone who faces hopkins has their career worst performance. That is by design. Hopkins takes away their best weapon and when he does that, they usually have nothing left. Only extremely versatile fighters (like Calzghe) can get by but still look like ****. What does Tarver do? He has that one two he sets his shots up with. Once hopkins takes that away he's nothing. He did the same against Pavlik.

                    Ask yourself why do all these fighters have their worst performance against Hopkins? At some point you need to realize that the man in the ring (hopkins) is responsible for that.

                    Comment


                      Originally posted by ИATAS206 View Post
                      The who's who of 175. Not sure who else he could have beat. he beat all the names. Jones, Glen Johnson, Woods, Griffin and all of the solid lower level guys. Again, he was the man at 175 when Hopkins beat him.




                      Paper? lol paper is Andre Berto. Paper is not when you KTFO the reigning champ and defend the titles



                      No one looks the same against Hopkins. No one. Pavlik, Trinidad, Glen Johnson, Taylor, Calzaghe, Winky, Pascal, it's no coincidence that everyone who faces hopkins has their career worst performance. That is by design. Hopkins takes away their best weapon and when he does that, they usually have nothing left. Only extremely versatile fighters (like Calzghe) can get by but still look like E****. What does Tarver do? He has that one two he sets his shots up with. Once hopkins takes that away he's nothing. He did the same against Pavlik.

                      Ask yourself why do all these fighters have their worst performance against Hopkins? At some point you need to realize that the man in the ring (hopkins) is responsible for that.
                      Alright woods was a crap fighter and Roy was slowing down by that time watch is four or five fights before Ruiz and look at fighters be hop fought look what you just said he nullified a one two that's like simple as hell winky was to small he's got trinadad and pavlik that's it I'm saying tarver was drained and whooped by the time he fought Hopkins he was there when the division was empty honestly who was there to fight woods, Johnson and griffin maybe harding but he's just not credible at that point to me but nice argument just two diffrent views

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP