Originally posted by ChopperRead
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is it disgraceful for a mandatory to backout of a title shot because of a hotel room?
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by WladIsTheChamp View PostLet's say you were getting a mandatory shot against the #1 HW in the world for a chance to get 3 titles off him and you were getting paid $2.5 million, 10 times more money than you have ever seen in your past fights. There are no rematch clauses and your promotional team lost the bid because they bid half of the Champ's bid, so in the end it actually worked out well for you because now your share of the purse is twice as much. According to the mandatory rules, the champ gets to dictate small details about the contract, and he tells you that you must stay in such and such hotel, but he was paying for the hotel stay for you and your whole team. Would you ditch the shot at 3 belts and $2.5 million because you didn't like the hotel you were staying in?
Comment
-
Originally posted by WladIsTheChamp View PostYou don't know **** apparently. So Povetkin was sitting on a mandatory shot for 2+ years, gets a $2.5 million purse and a chance at 3 belts, and he turns it down because he didn't like his hotel room? Oh and don't forget that intially his trainer came out and said "Povetkin is not ready", so if you are going to believe Povetkin now, then you must have **** for brains.
Comment
-
Originally posted by WladIsTheChamp View PostYou don't know **** apparently. So Povetkin was sitting on a mandatory shot for 2+ years, gets a $2.5 million purse and a chance at 3 belts, and he turns it down because he didn't like his hotel room? Oh and don't forget that intially his trainer came out and said "Povetkin is not ready", so if you are going to believe Povetkin now, then you must have **** for brains.
But now Povetkin is blaming the no-show on K2's contracts.
I guess Kalle told him to start towing the company line.
Comment
-
Originally posted by johnm View PostAnd your immediate defense is babbling on and on about Haye, who has nothing to do with the conversation. I don't give a **** ass about David Haye.
I'm sure there are other examples, but that is a good one as Barrett had a lot to say about it publicly, and Monte is one of the nicest guys in the sport, so he doesn't complain for no reason.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Pullcounter View Postthe hotel room was probably just an excuse, but wlad shouldn't be a cheap ass like team khan.
Comment
-
Originally posted by ChopperRead View PostSettle down. Haye was just the first and best example that came to mind of a boxer other than a Klitschko screwing with the opposition, if that's how you see it.
I'm sure there are other examples, but that is a good one as Barrett had a lot to say about it publicly, and Monte is one of the nicest guys in the sport, so he doesn't complain for no reason.
Comment
-
Originally posted by johnm View PostYou have the attention span of a fucking donkey.
Your dumb@ss believes Povetkin but you can't even remember what Povetkin's trainer said last year and you are talking about attention spans?
You are too ****** to argue with.
Comment
-
Originally posted by WladIsTheChamp View PostComing from a guy that doesn't even know how a mandatory purse bid process works in boxing....
Your dumb@ss believes Povetkin but you can't even remember what Povetkin's trainer said last year and you are talking about attention spans?
You are too ****** to argue with.
Comment
Comment