Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Rebuttal To "Year end review of Floyd and alleged PED use..."

Collapse
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #11
    Originally posted by sigrab jr View Post
    I can't believe what I just read.

    Do you re-read what you type and really think about it?

    This is ridiculously ******.


    its all true and you know it

    Comment


      #12
      Originally posted by MindBat View Post
      Again, I repeat: NOBODY from Team Pacquiao nor even his most devoted fansopposed to the "random" drug tests were saying anything remotely close to "Year Round Drug Testing" back in 2009 when they talks were ongoing. Not a word in the media about "Year Round Drug Testing" from any of the pros in the industry to justify Manny backing out of "random" style drug testing.

      It's only been the few Floyd haters not even connected to Team Pacquiao who keep bringing it up.
      man, i just love it how go back to the testing..

      **** better testing if its gonna stop the most significant fight happening.

      floyd has to want the fight.... so far, his actions show he doesn't want it.

      Comment


        #13
        thanks to floyd's introduction to "random" testing, the nsac has reviewed their testing and found at that floyd was right, and has implemented better testing that includes blood testing up to the day before the fight.

        no, wait, that didn't happen....


        they did review their testing and found out that blood testing to close to a fight to present unnecessary risks such as hematoma. actual doctors determined it is unnecessary.

        but the nsac are *******s and just want to make floyd look bad, right?

        Comment


          #14
          hell, even ***** ex bff victor conte says floyd and pacquiao should meet in the middle, as no testing is a sure thing. that he commends pacquiao for agreeing to better testing than what the commission asks him to.

          i say **** the fake ass PED crusade and its bandwagon supporters.

          Comment


            #15
            Originally posted by Johnny Chingas View Post
            Quit crying.

            Real random drug testing is year round. It doesn't matter who proposed what according to you guys in regards to Olympic style drug testing,


            [Floyd]"who cares that Floyd asked for better testing, hes the one in the ring and he has a right to feel his opponent is clean, it doesn't matter that it was him asking for it, what matters is that it was brought up".[/Stan]


            So, it shouldn't matter who proposed what in regards to doing extra testing that isn't even required by the same commissions that Floyd has been fighting under for his entire career.

            The issue with you cats is, "why wouldn't anyone want better drug testing"?


            Ok, cool.

            Year round random drug testing>>>>>>Olympic style drug testing knowing the period in which you are to be tested.



            Facts,

            Floyd is terrified of welters in their primes whether it was Margarito, Cotto or Manny now.

            Facts, the sissy always had an excuse when a tough challenge was on the horizon.


            Nobody from the commissions, HBO, Arum and Manny or their team even had to entertain the thought of any extra testing for one fight, but they played Floyds game, called his bluff and watched him fold and go on vacation.

            The crux of the matter,

            Floyds a b itch and the world knows it. There are proper ways to make changes within sports, and then there are ways to act like you're doing something for the betterment of the sport while having an ulterior motive. The ulterior motive in this case for Floyd,

            act like he wants the fight, just as he has in the past, and then put up speedbumps, k-rails, tire ****es and all sorts of roadblocks to make sure it doesn't happen.

            To this day, there is still no petition from Floyd, or any other fighters or promotional companies to the sanctioning bodies or governing commissions to include any type of random drug testing.

            So, go ahead,

            ‎"put it on facebook, tell 'em about that, handle that, show 'em that, facebook that" "Now put that on your f ucking wall".
            Geeze, I'm wiping my tears.

            The question is: Where were you with these opinions when negotiations started in '09? I don't recall you ever bringing any of that up back then until now. People wonder why.

            Fact:

            Not even the commission nor the USADA brought up "Year Round Drug Testing must be done for it to have an effective outcome."

            They're the pros.

            Why are you and others bringing it up now when the pros did not back then?

            Can you answer that without feeling uptight?

            Originally posted by Ryannn View Post
            man, i just love it how go back to the testing..

            **** better testing if its gonna stop the most significant fight happening.

            floyd has to want the fight.... so far, his actions show he doesn't want it.
            I will take a wild guess and venture to say he's not willing to play their silly games in the media any more.

            I think he believes everybody knows the facts of what really went down, and it will eventually come to light when it's all said and done even if they never fight.

            Comment


              #16
              I will take a wild guess and venture to say he's not willing to play their silly games in the media any more.

              I think he believes everybody knows the facts of what really went down, and it will eventually come to light when it's all said and done even if they never fight.
              yes, he didn't want the media attention...

              that's why he came out with a racist rant about pacquiao right about the time margarito-pacquiao got signed....

              floyd is so smart.

              Comment


                #17
                Originally posted by Ryannn View Post
                thanks to floyd's introduction to "random" testing, the nsac has reviewed their testing and found at that floyd was right, and has implemented better testing that includes blood testing up to the day before the fight.

                no, wait, that didn't happen....


                they did review their testing and found out that blood testing to close to a fight to present unnecessary risks such as hematoma. actual doctors determined it is unnecessary.

                but the nsac are *******s and just want to make floyd look bad, right?

                Ok genius. Answer this...

                How do you compare a tiny needle prick on the arm to Manny's face getting hit AND cut AND bleeding from it AND the corner working on them to stop the bleeding DURING the fight???

                Can you answer that with FACTS?

                Comment


                  #18
                  Originally posted by MindBat View Post
                  Ok genius. Answer this...

                  How do you compare a tiny needle prick on the arm to Manny's face getting hit AND cut AND bleeding from it AND the corner working on them to stop the bleeding???

                  Can you answer that with FACTS?
                  what, so pacquiao should take the test even if it might compromise his well being cause he is gonna get cut/bleed in the fight anyways?

                  what kind of ******ed logic is that?

                  don't get mad at me. get mad at the commission who says what floyd is asking for is bullshit..

                  Comment


                    #19
                    Originally posted by MindBat View Post
                    Geeze, I'm wiping my tears.

                    The question is: Where were you with these opinions when negotiations started in '09? I don't recall you ever bringing any of that up back then until now. People wonder why.

                    Fact:

                    Not even the commission nor the USADA brought up "Year Round Drug Testing must be done for it to have an effective outcome."

                    They're the pros.

                    Why are you and others bringing it up now when the pros did not back then?

                    Can you answer that without feeling uptight?


                    Uptight?

                    The only thing uptight is my belt on that a ss with these postal whippings you're getting.

                    In 2009, nobody even cared about the issue because there were negotiations going on for a single month. The month of December. So, don't try to get slick with me Willie trying to make it look like its been a whole two years that this whole charade of wanting "better drug testing".

                    lol, 2009. Manny ****d Cotto in November 2009, and then the crackheads started with all of their allegations.

                    2009.

                    lo f ucking l. One whole damn month.

                    31 freaking days! 2009!

                    Yea, thats where I was with it.

                    Heres an even better question,

                    where were you in the decade of 2000 with demands for better drug testing within the sport of boxing?

                    Lets be real about it. Fighters had been getting caught early in the decade, american fighters mind you,

                    and you didn't think to make some noise about it until the last month of 2009, and only because an american fighter accused a foreign fighter of using?


                    In regards to the commissions, since "they're the pros",

                    they obviously see no need for extra tests.

                    So whats the hold up again?

                    Oh yea,

                    vacation.

                    Like my mom used to tell me when I was about to get whipped with the belt,

                    "bend over and grab your ankles".

                    Comment


                      #20
                      Originally posted by Ryannn View Post
                      what, so pacquiao should take the test even if it might compromise his well being cause he is gonna get cut/bleed in the fight anyways?

                      what kind of ******ed logic is that?

                      don't get mad at me. get mad at the commission who says what floyd is asking for is bullshit..
                      Originally Posted by MindBat


                      Fact:

                      the commission

                      They're the pros.
                      Funny how they're the pros only when its convenient eh?

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X
                      TOP