Of course. I'll give you an example where Astrology was overpowered by other factors.
Mike Tyson v. Buster Douglas
Astrologically speaking, Tyson's chart was superior to Douglas'. Yet Douglas scored the upset.
Other factors contributed to the upset like:
* Mike Tyson was dealing with personal turmoil outside of the ring
* Mike Tyson was no longer training seriously
* Mike Tyson's team was unbelievably incompetent at the time
* Buster Douglas used the death of his mother as motivation
Astrology has to be used with the mindset "if all things are even..."
As you know in boxing as well as life, all things aren't always even going into a given event.
In other words if you call a fight based on astrology and you are correct you will say it was astrology, and if you're wrong you will blame other factors?
How about this, Rass? I'm pretty much me on these forums. I don't put on any kind of act, what you see is what you get. Can you guess which sign I am just from the way I interact with you? I'd be glad to give you any information you needed outside of my birthdate or personal stuff.
as i have addressed in this thread if in fact you did read though it.
it's ALMOST impossible to peg someone based on impression. a lot of people throw up projections. extremely feminine signs over-compensate masculinity while masculine signs are naturally hot headed and stubborn. and of course there's the whole natal chart aspects.
that is why astrology is relevant in boxing. where peak condition athletes who trained the same craft with the same drive to succeed are pitted against one another...... what's left to analyze is their heart, will and mental toughness. no pretentions or projections or false bravados. fighters are stripped naked that way.
.
Comment